我國競技運動選手培訓與生涯照顧體制之研究－策略思維觀點

The Study of the System of Athletics' Training Cultivation and Their Career Safeguard in Taiwan Based on the Strategic Viewpoint

李建興(Chien-Shing Lee)

《思與言：人文與社會科學期刊》 47卷1期 (2009/03) Pp. 215-249

https://doi.org/10.6431/TWJHSS.200903.0215

摘要

在全球化的今日，運動競賽成績是國際就爭力的表徵，受到國人的關注，而就技運動選手培訓與生涯照顧是相當重要環節。因此，本研究目的針對我國競技運動選手培訓與生涯照顧體制，成策略管理的學理作爲實務政策分析的方法。研究結論認爲：
一、後殖民的國際速作造成國內運動人才的外流，加上國人對於競技運動棋王兵價值視之，品解決國際認同典自我認同的混淆，阻礙競技運動選手培訓的健全發展。
二、我國運動選手的遜、訓、用傾向社會主義國家模式，選手退休後的職場傾向資本主義模式。選手概括承受體制結構的擺盪與不連貫，造成生涯照顧的問題業生。
三、臺灣人民對於運動、運動員、運動教練能源自內心的認同，是解決研究問題的真正開始。

關鍵字

選手訓練 ； 生涯發展 ； 競技運動 ； 策略 ； 政策

並列摘要

Under the globalization today, the performance of sports contests is one of the critical competitive index received attention by most people. The system of athletics' training cultivation and their career safeguard plays an important role for the results. Therefore, this study is to clarify Taiwan's system of athletics' training cultivation and their career safeguard, based on the theories of strategy management to analyze the present practical policy. The results are as follows:
1. Because of the operation of the post-colonialism in the field of Taiwan's sports, many better athletes play abroad. Moreover, people in Taiwan consider sports as one tool to solve their confusion of international approval and self-identification. The above factors become the barriers of the wholesome development of athletics' training cultivation.
2. The system related to athletics' selection, training and contest in Taiwan is inclined to socialism. But the market faced by most retired athletes is inclined to capitalism. The inconsistence and confliction between these two polities cause many problems to the attention of athletes' carrier.
3. The initial resolution of these questions under research, comes from the sincerely recognition to sports, sportsmen and coachers by Taiwanese.

並列關鍵字

athletes' training ； career safeguard ； strategy ； policy

參考文獻

Aaker, D. A.(1989).Managing assets and skills The key to a sustainable competitive Advantage.California Management Review.Winter,91-106.

Brichford, M.(2001).Militarism and the modem Olympic Games.North American Society Conference.(North American Society Conference).

Chalip, L.,Johnon, A.(1996).National sports policies.CT:Greenwood Press.

Cornell, T.(2002).On War and Games in the Ancient World Oct 18th.Olympic Studies symposium.(Olympic Studies symposium).

Discovery Channel(2000).(Ultimate athlete: Pushing the limit).