透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.136.154.103

摘要


雖然以往眾多忽略效果的研究都聚焦在探討資訊過程與動機的影響上,但是對資訊過程與動機有顯著影響的決策流暢性,此研究缺口依然尚未釐清。實驗一與二的實證結果說明高擷取流暢性與高過程流暢性皆會使消費者傾向不採取行動(忽略效果),反之,低擷取流暢性與高過程流暢性則讓消費者傾向採取行動。此外,兩個實驗也都證實情感中介了流暢性與忽略效果。

並列摘要


Despite extensive research of omission effect focusing on the influence of information processing and motivation, the importance of the role of fluency on omission effect remains unclear. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that consumers with high retrieval and processing fluency are more likely to take inaction (omission effect). By contrast, consumers with low retrieval and processing fluency are more likely to take action (commission effect). Besides, Studies 1 and 2 further demonstrate the mediating role of the incidental affect induced by fluency in the theoretical link between fluency and omission effect.

參考文獻


Chang, C. J.(2013).Price or quality? The influence of fluency on the dual role of price.Marketing Letters.1-12.
Chernev, A.(2004).Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo.Journal of Consumer Research.31,557-565.
Dhar, R.(1997).Consumer preference for a no-choice option.Journal of Consumer Research.24,215-231.
Kahneman, D.,Knetsch, J. L.,Thaler, R. H.(1991).Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias.The journal of economic perspectives.5,193-206.
Novemsky, N.,Dhar, R.,Schwarz, N.,Simonson, I.(2007).Preference fluency in choice.Journal of Marketing Research.44,347-356.

延伸閱讀