摘要
本論文旨在探究習得中文的兒童在及物謂語方面的發展，因為習得其他語言如英語、日語等的兒童都有將不及物動詞當作使動動詞使用的傾向(the transitive-tocausative bias)，然而習得閩南語的兒童卻具有把結果補語當作使動動詞使用的傾向(the resultative-to-causative bias)，因此本論文想要探索習得中文的兒童是否具有把不及物動詞當作使動動詞使用的傾向，還是是與閩南語相同，具有把結果補語當作使動動詞使用的傾向。
本論文的研究材料為四位習得中文的兒童的錄音語料。本研究結果顯示，習得中文的兒童顯示出不及物動詞當作使動動詞使用的傾向，而非結果補語當作使動動詞使用的傾向。
另外本論文採納Larson (1988) VP-shell 的理論來分析習得中文的兒童在及物謂語方面的發展。結果顯示兒童習得及物謂語共可分為三個階段：第一個階段為空的輕動詞，第二個階段為「給」為輕動詞，第三個階段為習得詞彙句法層面的使役結構。

Abstract
Children overgeneralize intransitive verbs for causative verbs. This phenomenon is called the intransitive-to-causative bias. However, Lin & Tsay (2008) argue that the overgeneralization pattern in Taiwan Southern Min shows a resultative-to-causative bias, which is different from the bias mentioned above. On the other hand, Murasugi & Hashimoto (2004) follow the analysis of Larson’s VP shell hypothesis to account for certain phenomena in early Japanese, and argue that there exist four stages when Japanese-speaking children are acquiring verbs and morphological –(s)ase causative constructions.
Previous studies did not discuss the relevant phenomena in Mandarin Chinese. Thus, the main purpose of this paper is to figure out whether Mandarin Chinese has the intransitiveto-causative bias or the resultative-to-causative bias. This paper also uses VP shell hypothesis to explain the development of the causative constructions in Mandarin Chinese. We observe the usages of element gei in early Mandarin Chinese for this purpose.
After examing data of four children from Child Corpus developed by Hsu, we find that Mandarin-speaking children show the intransitive-to-causative bias, and that there exist three stages in the acquisition of Mandarin-speaking children. The first stage is when the small v is phonetically null. The second stage is is when the small v can be realized as gei. The last stage is the acquisition of morpho-syntactic causative constructions. The acquisition stages in Mandarin Chinese are different from those in Japanese. We argue that inflections cause the divergence. The evidence is the difference of tense morphology between Japanese and Mandarin Chinese.

Table of Contents
摘要....................................................................................................... i
Abstract ............................................................................................... ii
Acknowledgements……………….………………………...……………………...iii
Table of Contents…………………….......………………………………………...v
List of Tables………………………………....……………………………………...vii
List of Figures………………………………………………………………………..vii
List of Abbreviations………………………………………………………………..viii
Chapter 1 Introduction......................................................................... 1
Chapter 2 Literature review and questions ........................................... 5
2.1 The intransitive-to-Causative Bias................................................. 5
2.2 Resultative-to-Causative Bias ....................................................... 8
2.3 The syntactic explanation of intransitive-to-causative bias ........... 11
2.4 Interim summary............................................................................ 21
Chapter 3 The Gei constructions........................................................... 23
3.1 Giving............................................................................................. 23
3.2 Beneficiary ..................................................................................... 26
3.3 Goal............................................................................................... 32
3.4 Causative ...................................................................................... 34
3.5 Affective/Disposal ......................................................................... 38
3.6 Passive........................................................................................... 40
3.7 Interim summary............................................................................ 43
Chapter 4 Data &Results ...................................................................... 50
4.1 Data description............................................................................. 50
4.2 Results .......................................................................................... 52
4.2.1 Intransitive-to-causative bias..................................................... 52
4.2.2 Multiple usages of gei ................................................................ 54
4.2.2.1 Giving...................................................................................... 55
4.2.2.2 Beneficiary .............................................................................. 58
4.2.2.3 Goal......................................................................................... 60
4.2.2.4 Causative ................................................................................ 62
4.2.2.5 Affective/disposal ................................................................... 65
4.2.6 Passive........................................................................................ 67
4.3 Interim summary............................................................................ 68
Chapter 5 Discussion............................................................................ 70
5.1 Intransitive-to-causative bias......................................................... 70
5.2 The syntactic explanation of intransitive-to-causative bias in MC... 72
5.3 The divergency between acquisition of Japanese and MC................. 79
5.4 Conclusion...................................................................................... 81
Reference.............................................................................................. 83

Figueira, R.A. (1984) On the development of the expression of causativity: A syntactic hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 11(1), 109-127.
Baker, M. (1996). On the structural positions of themes and goals. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Berman, R. A. (1993). Marking of verb transitivity by hebrew-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 20(3), 641-669.
Bowerman, M. (1974). Learning the structure of causative verbs: A study in the relationship of cognitive, semantic and syntactic development. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 8, 142-178.
Chang, L.-L. (2006). The semantic development from causatives to passives in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 7(1), 139-174.
Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkekey: University of California Press.
Chen, H.-S. (2005). Acquisition of novel causative and inchoative verb alternation in Mandarin Chinese. MA thesis, Tsing Hua university.
Cheng, L. L.-S., C.-T. J. Huang, Y.-H. A. Li and C.-C. J. Tang. 1997. Causative Compounds across Chinese Dialects: A Study of Cantonese, Mandarin and Taiwanese . Chinese Languages and Linguistics, 4: 199-224. Academia Sinica.
Cheng, L. L.-S., James, H. C.-T., Li, Y. H. A. & Jane, T. C. C. (1996). Hoo, Hoo, Hoo:syntax of the causative, dative and passive construction in Taiwanese. Journal of Chinese Linguistic, 2.3: 279-324.
Cheung, H. (1998). Utterance length and the development of Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the The First Asia-Pacific Conference on Speech Language and Hearing.
Cheung, S. L. (1998). Causatives verbs in child Cantonese. The proceedings of the twentyninth annual child language research forum.84
Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology. Chcago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dakubu, M. E. K. & Ford, K. C. (1988). The Central-Togo languages. London: KeganPual. Eilfort, W. H., Kroeber, P. D. & Peterson, K. L. (1985). Papers for the parasession on causatives and agentivity. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Her, O.-S. (2006). Justifying part-of-speech sssignments for Mandarin gei. Lingua, 116(8), 1274-1302.
Hsu, J. (1996 ). A study of the stages of development and acquisition of Mandarin Chinese by children in Taiwan. Taipei: Crane Publishig Co. Ltd.
Huang, C.-R. & Ahrens, K. (1999). The function and category of gei in Mandarin ditransitive constructions. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 27(2), 1-26.
Huang, C.-R. & Mo, R.-P. (1992). Mandarin ditransitive constructions and the categary of gei. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Huang, C.-T. J. (2007). “Hanyu dongci de tiyuan jiegou yu qi jufa biaoxian,” [The thematic structures of verbs in Chinese and their syntactic projection]. Linguistic Sciences, 6(4), 3-21.
Kemmer, S. & Verhagen, A. (1994). The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 115-156.
Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335–391.
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, Y. H. A. (1985). Abstract case in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
Li, Y. H. A. (1990). Order and consituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lin, H.-L. & Tsay, J. S. (2008). Acquiring causatives in Taiwan Southern Min. Journal of Child Language, 35(2), 467-487.
Liu, F.-H. (2006). Dative constructions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 7(4), 863-904.
Morikawa, H. 1991. Acquisition of causatives in Japanese. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 30, 80-87
Murasugi, K. & Fuji, C. (2008). Root infinitives: the parallel routes the Japanese- and Korean-speaking children step in. Paper presented at the Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference 18.
Murasugi, K., & Fuji, C. (2009). Root infinitives in Japanese and the late acquisition of headmovement. Paper presented at the 33rd Boston University Conference on Language Development.
Murasugi, K., Fuji, C., & Hashimoto, M. (2007). What acquired later in an agglutinative language. Paper presented at the Asian Glow VI.
Murasugi, K. & Hashimoto, T. (2004). Three pieces of acquisition evidence for the v-VP frame. Nanzan Linguistics, 1, 1-19.
Murasugi, K., Hashimoto, T. & Fuji, C. (2007). VP-shell analysis for the acquisition of Japanese intransitive verbs, transitive verbs, and causatives. Linguistics, 45(3), 615-651.
Newman, J. (1993). The semantics of giving in Mandarin. Conceptualizations and mental processing in language. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York, 433–485.
Newman, J. (1996). Give: A cognitive linguistic study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nomura, M. & Shirai, Y. (Eds.). (1996). Overextension of intransitive verbs in the acuisition of Japanese. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Shibatani, M. (1976). The grammar of causative constructions. Syntax and semantics, 6, 1-40
Tai, J. H.-Y. (1985). Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tang, C.-C. J. (1990). Chinese phrase structure and the extended X'-Theory. Ph.D. dissertation: Cornell University.
Tang, S.-W. (2001). A Complementation approach to Chinese passives and its consequences. Linguistics, 39(2), 257-295.
Thepkanjana, K. & Uehara, S. (2008). The verb of giving in Thai and Mandarin Chinese as a case of polysemy: A comparative study. Language Sciences, 30(6), 621-651.
Ting, J. & Chang, M. (2004). The category of gei in Mandarin Chinese and
grammaticalization. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 2(2), 45-74.
Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognitive, 74, 209-253.
Tsai, W.-T. D. (2007). Four types of affective aonstructions in Chinese. Paper presented at the 5th Workshop on Formal Syntax & Semantics, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung
Tsai, W.-T. D. (2009). High applicatives are not high enough: a Cartographic solution. Paper presented at the 6th Workshop on Formal Syntax & Semantics, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei
Washio, R. (1993). When causatives mean passive: a cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2, 45-90.
Xu, D. (1994). The status of marker gei in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 22(2), 363-394.
Yang, S.-Y. (1991). Dative alternative in Chinese and English. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Connecticut.
Yap, F. & Iwasaki, S. (2003). From causative to passive: a passage in some East and Southeast Asian languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Yap, F. & Iwasaki, S. (1998). 'Give' constructions in Malay, Thai and Mandarin Chinese: A polygrammaticization perspective. Papers from the Regional Meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society, 34(1), 421-437.
Zhang, S. (1990). Correlations between the double object construction and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2), 312-316.
Ziegeler, D. (2000). A possession-based analysis of the ba-construction in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua, 110(11), 807-842.
張顯達，1998，兒童學習國語的困難在哪裡 ? 專題演講，發表於彰化基督教醫院醫學研究部兒童發展中心。