透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.131.178

摘要


Tc-99m DISIDA cholescintigraphy is a highly sensitive and specific method of evaluating cystic duct obstruction in acute cholecystitis. It has also been argued that cholescintigraphy has high sensitivity in the differential diagnosis of gallstone pancreatitis due to cystic duct obstruction following gallstone migration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical availability of cholescintigraphy in acute pancreatitis. Tc-99m DISIDA cholescintigraphy performed in 18 patients with documented acute pancreatitis, including 11 gallstone and 7 nonbiliary, were reviewed. Abnormal scans were obtained in 82% (9/11) of acute gallstone pancreatitis, while only 29% (2/7) of acute nonbiliary pancreatitis had abnormal scan. These results demonstrated a significant difference with Fisher¡¦s exact test (p<0.05). An abnormal cholescintigraphy had a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 71% and an accuracy of 78% in detecting gallstone pancreatitis. Ten cases of acute gallstone pancreatitis coincided with cholecystitis (2 cases of acute and chronic, and 8 cases of chronic). Both cases of acute nonbiliary pancreatitis with abnormal scan had total parenteral nutrition over 5 days. In conclusion, abnormal cholescintigraphy in acute pancreatitis indicates gallstone origin and may coincide with cholecystitis; while, a normal cholescintigraphy largely excludes such diagnoses.

關鍵字

無資料

並列摘要


Tc-99m DISIDA cholescintigraphy is a highly sensitive and specific method of evaluating cystic duct obstruction in acute cholecystitis. It has also been argued that cholescintigraphy has high sensitivity in the differential diagnosis of gallstone pancreatitis due to cystic duct obstruction following gallstone migration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical availability of cholescintigraphy in acute pancreatitis. Tc-99m DISIDA cholescintigraphy performed in 18 patients with documented acute pancreatitis, including 11 gallstone and 7 nonbiliary, were reviewed. Abnormal scans were obtained in 82% (9/11) of acute gallstone pancreatitis, while only 29% (2/7) of acute nonbiliary pancreatitis had abnormal scan. These results demonstrated a significant difference with Fisher¡¦s exact test (p<0.05). An abnormal cholescintigraphy had a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 71% and an accuracy of 78% in detecting gallstone pancreatitis. Ten cases of acute gallstone pancreatitis coincided with cholecystitis (2 cases of acute and chronic, and 8 cases of chronic). Both cases of acute nonbiliary pancreatitis with abnormal scan had total parenteral nutrition over 5 days. In conclusion, abnormal cholescintigraphy in acute pancreatitis indicates gallstone origin and may coincide with cholecystitis; while, a normal cholescintigraphy largely excludes such diagnoses.

並列關鍵字

Pancreatitis gallstonc cholescintigraphy

延伸閱讀