白肉雞產業分業、分責、分享制度之分析

An Analysis on the Practice of Enterprises Sharing Responsibility and Profits in the Broiler Industry

黃炳文(Biing-Wen Huang) ； 馮誠萬(C. W. Feng) ； 邵敬之(Ching-Chih Shao)

《中華農學會報》 8卷6期 (2007/12) Pp. 554-570

https://doi.org/10.6730/JAAC.200712_8(6).0005

摘要

為因應開放雞肉進口的衝擊，自民國91年開始試辦白肉雞產業之「分業、分責、分享」制度。雖然其立意甚佳，但參與者仍不踴躍，此意含該制度的設計仍有待改善之處。本研究發現，除91年度外，92及93年度均出現虧損，其主要原因為參與者的育成率偏低、飼料換肉率偏高、飼料價格波動大。在分責方面，基準成本為固定，較無法反映實際狀況的波動；對肉雞業者之低育成率的扣款，不能反應其基本責任與貢獻。在分享方面，毛雞價格變動在各業的分享比例不一致，低育成率對肉雞業者較為有利，高育成率對飼料業者較為有利。若能將此制度的相關課題予以改善，將有助此制度的推展。

關鍵字

分責分享 ； 育成率 ； 飼料換肉率

並列摘要

To overcome the impact of opening up the Republic of China to chicken imports, the practice of enterprises sharing responsibility and profits was experimentally implemented in 2002. Although its objective is fine, enterprises did not enthusiastically participate. This implies that the design of institution may need to be improved. Except in the year 2002, this analysis finds that the institution displayed deficits in the 2003 and 2004 financial reports. Its reasons were mostly due to lower survival rate, higher feed conversion ratio, and high variation of feed price. In sharing responsibility, the fixed base cost could not reflect the real situation's responsibility. In sharing profits, the sharing rate was not consistent among enterprises as broiler's price changed. A lower survival rate relatively benefited growers, but the higher survival rate relatively benefited feed enterprises. If those shortcomings could be overcome, this institution could be successfully implemented.

並列關鍵字

Sharing Responsibility and Profit ； Survival Rate ； Feed Conversion Ration