透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.136.26.20
  • 期刊

從歐盟與會員國公民概念之比較評估歐洲公民之實質化

Prospects for Substantiation of European Citizenship- A Comparison of Citizenship Concepts at EU and National Levels

摘要


本文旨在評估歐洲公民實質化之前景。歐洲公民的實質化毫無疑問需要仰賴歐盟會員國公民概念的調整。本文分「歐盟」與「會員國」兩個層次針對公民概念的演化 (包括公民界定之相關立法/修法,以及這些法律演變之邏輯)進行分析。文章在比較二者軌跡之後,對歐洲公民短期內實質化做出不樂觀的評估,原因在於「歐盟」與「會員國」公民概念演化的邏輯不僅幾乎完全獨立,甚至具有極大程度的不相容性。在歐盟層次,公民概念的發展是許多「應然」的累積,冀望民族主義與國家意識的淡化,充滿理想主義色彩。而在會員國層次,公民概念的轉化則並未與歐洲公民的建構接軌,反倒是各個國家根據其歷史遺產及政治現況而有所調整。

並列摘要


This article evaluates the prospects for the substantiation of “Europen citizenship”. The substantiation of European citizenship hinges on the transformation at the Member State level of the concepts of citizenship. Contrasting the evolutions of citizenship concepts at the Union and the Member State levels, this article concludes that, given the different logics and even incompatibility of the paths of evolution at these two levels, it is unlikely that European citizenship can be substantiated in the near future. At the Union level, the concept of citizenship is a compilation of normative or even idealistic principles, expectant of the subsidence of nationalism. The transformation of citizenship concepts at the Member State level, however, has seemed unmindful of the construction of European citizenship, and reflected only their respective historical legacies and domestic politics.

參考文獻


(2002).EuObserver.com.
(2002).EuObserver.com.
(2003).EuObserver.com.
(1998).Blurred Boundaries: Migration, Ethnicity, Citizenship.Aldershot:Ashgate.
(1995).Theorizing Citizenship.State University of New York Press:

被引用紀錄


吳振逢(2010)。從德國聯邦制度論歐洲聯盟整合趨勢〔博士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.00159
陳宜瑩(2008)。瑞士加入歐盟的前景及展望(1992-2007)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.01196
紀佩汾(2006)。歐盟憲法之形成及其評估〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2006.01027

延伸閱讀