透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.140.185.147
  • 期刊

環境目標結構、自我決定動機與學業情緒之關係

The Relation of Environmental Goal Structure, Self-determined Motivation and Academic Emotions

摘要


本研究試圖結合環境目標結構、自我決定理論與學業情緒的認知-動機模式建構自我決定動機歷程模式,目的在驗證此模式是否與觀察資料適配,並分析環境目標結構、自我決定動機與學業情緒之關係。為達研究目的,本研究抽取台灣地區11所學校共707名八年級國中生為研究樣本。本研究的發現如下:一、自我決定動機歷程模式可用來解釋國內國中生的觀察資料;二、就兩種環境目標結構對於自我決定動機歷程、學業情緒歷程及學業成就的效果值而言,精熟目標結構比表現目標結構有較大的影響;三、在自我決定動機歷程中,勝任感對自主動機的全體效果最大;四、自主動機對學業情緒、認知—動機變項、學業成就有正向的全體效果;五、學業情緒對認知-動機變項、學業成就有正向的全體效果;而認知—動機變項對學業成就亦有正向的全體效果。本研究根據研究結果提出建議,以提供未來研究及國中教學輔導之參考。

並列摘要


This present study included environmental goal structure, self-determination theory and the model of academic emotions cognitive-motivational that constructed the self-determined motivation process model. The aims of this study were to test if the data-model fit the data observed and to examine the relationships among environmental goal structure, self-determined motivation and academic emotions. In order to fulfill the goal, participants included 707 eighth grade junior high school students from 11 schools in Taiwan. The results of this study were: (a) The self-determined motivation process model constructed in this study could be used to well explain the empirically observed data in this sample of students in Taiwan. (b) The data analyses showed that Mastery goal structure, compared to performance goal structure, had more positive total effects on the self-determination motivation process, the process of academic emotion process, and academic outcomes than Performance goal structure. (c) Students' sense of competence had the strongest effect on the autonomous motivation. (d) The Autonomous motivation had positive total effect on the academic emotions, cognitive-motivational variables, and academic outcomes. (e) The Academic emotions had positive total effect on cognitive-motivational variables and academic outcomes, and cognitive-motivational variables had positive total effect on academic outcomes. Based on the findings of this study, suggestions were made for future research, as well as implications for junior high school teaching and educational guidance.

參考文獻


程炳林(2003)。四向度個人目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類。48(1),15-40。
程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式知建構及驗證。師大學報:教育類。46,67-92。
侯玫如、程炳林、于富雲(2004)。國中生多重目標導向與其自我調整學習之關係。教育心理學報。35,221-248。
(Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL (Version 8.51) [Computer softwar]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.).
Ames, C.(1992).Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology.84,261-271.

被引用紀錄


馮淑梅(2019)。不同課室目標結構對國中生自我調整學習策略與逃避策略影響之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2019.00566
蕭培以(2018)。不同教育階段資優生環境目標結構、個人目標導向與學業情緒之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DSE.043.2018.F02
賴思妤、陳李綢、何函儒(2022)。中學生正向學習量表之發展研究教育心理學報54(1),155-178。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202209_54(1).0007

延伸閱讀