透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.146.223
  • 期刊

未來取向之自我調整學習模式考驗暨檢驗課室目標結構的調節效果

Test of a model of future-oriented self-regulated learning and an examination of the moderating effect of classroom goal structures in the model.

摘要


本研究統整未來目標與成就目標理論,建構「未來取向之自我調整學習模式」,以解釋學習者的未來、近側目標對其自我調整學習(SRL)之影響;此外,本研究加入情境因素,探討課室目標結構(情境)與個人目標導向(個人)之交互作用對SRL 的影響。為完成上述目的,本研究以768 位國中生為觀察資料,並以結構方程模式進行統計分析。結果顯示本研究提出的理論模式受到國中生觀察資料支持,並指出未來內在目標最能預測趨向精熟目標,未來外在目標最能預測趨向表現目標,而趨向精熟目標對SRL 的預測效果最高。再者,研究結果支持課室目標結構在個人目標導向與SRL 之關係上的調節效果:當學習者知覺到精熟目標結構時,能提升趨向表現目標對SRL 的正向預測效果;當學習者知覺到表現目標結構時,則降低趨向表現目標對SRL 的正向預測效果。本研究依據研究結果提出建議,以作為提供國中教學輔導與未來研究之參考。

並列摘要


This study integrates future goal theory and achievement goal theory. This study aims to (a) construct a model of future-oriented self-regulated learning to explain the relations among students' distant goals, proximal goals, and self-regulated learning (SRL), and (b) investigate the moderating effect of students' perceptions of classroom goal structures within the model. 768 junior high school students were recruited to participate in the study. Structure equation modeling was used for data analysis. The results showed that the proposed model was supported by the observed data and truly suitable to interpret the relations among future goals, personal goal orientation, and SRL among Taiwanese students. Future intrinsic goal was found to be most strongly related to approach-mastery goal, whereas future extrinsic goal most closely associated with approach-performance goal. Also, approach-mastery goal had the strongest positive influence on SRL. Regarding the moderating role, it was found that classroom goal structures moderated the relation between personal goal orientation and SRL; namely, the small, positive relationship between approach-performance goal and SRL was enhanced within mastery classroom goal structures but was reduced within performance classroom goal structures. This empirical study not only contributes to theory development but also sheds light on the practice of teaching and mentoring.

參考文獻


林啟超(2009)。高職學生之未來時間觀、成就目標與適應性學習行為徑路模式之檢驗。教育實踐與研究。22,81-112。
彭淑玲、程炳林(2005)。四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係。師大學報:教育類。50,69-95。
程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類。48,39-58。
彭淑玲、程炳林(2012)。國中生未來目標量表之建構與信、效度分析。測驗學刊。59,547-579。
林宴瑛、彭淑玲(2015)。以多重目標觀點探討課室目標結構對國中生自我調整學習策略的影響:課室實驗教學研究。教育心理學報。47,159-178。

被引用紀錄


林淑君、王麗斐(2022)。愛在流轉:某偏鄉國中傳承式生涯輔導方案之實施與成效教育心理學報54(2),385-410。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202212_54(2).0006
許家驊(2021)。國小低年級學生多元解題自我調節量表之編製發展與實測研究教育心理學報52(4),829-856。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202106_52(4).0005
黃筠婷、程炳林(2021)。國中生學業情緒、情境興趣及學習涉入的交互關係教育心理學報52(3),571-593。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202103_52(3).0004
彭淑玲、程炳林(2020)。學生為何作弊?以條件化間接效果考驗課室目標結構、個人成就目標、無聊與作弊之關係教育心理學報51(3),387-413。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202003_51(3).0003
彭淑玲(2019)。知覺教師回饋、個人成就目標、學業自我效能與無聊之關係:中介效果與條件間接化效果分析教育心理學報51(1),83-108。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201909_51(1).0004

延伸閱讀