透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.143.17.128
  • 期刊

死亡威脅下訊息參照架構對說服之影響:調控焦點的調節效果

The Effects of Mortality Salience and Message Framing on Persuasion: Moderation of Regulatory Focus

摘要


本研究探討「死亡威脅」和「訊息調控焦點」對態度說服之交互作用效果。調控焦點理論(regulatory focus theory; Higgins, 1997)認為個體的動機狀態可區分為「促進焦點」(promotionfocus)與「預防焦點」(prevention focus)。過去研究發現當訊息的調控焦點形式,和個體的調控焦點狀態一致時,對說服會有較佳效果。依據過去實徵研究,研究者認為面對死亡威脅時,個體是處於預防焦點的心理狀態,此時以預防焦點形式呈現的訊息,會比以促進焦點形式呈現的訊息,來得有說服力。研究一(N=82)以恐懼管理理論(terror management theory; Greenberg, Pyszczynski, & Solomon, 1986)的實驗典範操弄死亡威脅,採2(死亡威脅:有/無)×2(訊息調控焦點:促進/預防)的完全受試間實驗設計;研究結果支持了上述假設:面對死亡威脅時,「預防焦點」訊息之說服效果,優於「促進焦點」訊息。研究二(N=48)採閾下(subliminal)知覺的方式促發死亡威脅,結果發現面對死亡威脅時,個體對「預防焦點」相關的剌激反應速度比控制組快。整體而言,二個研究均支持了死亡威脅與調控焦點一致性對說服之效果。

並列摘要


The current study explored the interaction effects of mortality salience and message framing on persuasion. It is argued that death-threatening may evoke people's prevention focus concerns, thus, based on the effect of <||>regulatory fit<||>, prevention-framed messages may be more persuasive in mortality salient contexts than promotion-framed ones. In Study 1, 82 military personnel participated in a 2 (mortality salience: experimental/control group) x 2 (message framing: promotion vs. prevention) factorial experiment. The results support the aforementioned hypothesis. In Study 2 (N=48), by using a subliminal perception task to manipulate mortality salience, it is found that people under death-threatening were faster in reacting to prevention-related words than people of control group.

參考文獻


Arndt, J.,Greenberg, J.,Pyszczynski, T.,Solomon, S.(1997).Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli increases defense of the cultural worldview.Psychological Science.8,379-385.
Arndt, J.,Greenberg, J.,Schimel, J.,Pyszczynski, T.,Solomon, S.(2002).To belong or not to belong, that is the question: Terror management and identification with gender and ethnicity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.83,26-43.
Becker, E.(1962).The birth and death of meaning.NY:Free Press.
Becker, E.(1973).The denial of death.NY:Free Press.
Becker, E.(1975).Escape from the evil.NY:Free Press.

被引用紀錄


楊淑雯(2010)。極大化傾向對後悔之影響:以調控焦點作為調節變項〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.00752
陳冠名、倪瑛蓮(2021)。調控焦點理論在運動休閒消費行為研究之運用嘉大體育健康休閒期刊20(2),97-107。https://doi.org/10.6169/NCYUJPEHR.202112_20(2).08
周宥均(2010)。銀行從業人員五大人格特質、主管領導型態與工作滿足、領導效能之關聯性研究-以調節焦點為干擾變項〔博士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0015-3012201016020900
陳佳彬(2012)。風險知覺、調節焦點與因應行為關聯之研究-以嘉義縣外勤消防人員為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613500198

延伸閱讀