透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.182.105
  • 期刊

華人組織中的人際壓力源:主位與客位構念之比較

Interpersonal Stressors in the Chinese Organizations: Etic and Emic Concepts Comparison

摘要


工作壓力問題一直以來受到組織行為研究者的高度關注,更是目前職場健康心理學研究中的重要核心議題。對於華人組織中的工作者而言,處理人際間的議題通常是華人工作者的首要任務,人際互動上若無法處理得宜將會造成壓力感受,使得工作難以進行。那麼瞭解人際壓力源的內涵與影響對於華人管理上便相當重要。儘管過去研究累積了一些成果,但多屬於複製型研究,未能考量華人文化價值的影響,便可能忽略了華人組織中情境特定的壓力源。有鑑於此,本研究以歸納研究取徑,採關鍵事例法回收84位在職工作者共272則的有效資料。研究結果發現了9大類人際壓力源向度,其中有4類與西方所述概念相似,另外5類延伸向度與西方所述不同。最後,針對本研究結果進行討論分析。整體而言,本研究釐清了華人組織中人際壓力源的重要構念,且彰顯了納入文化因子於人際壓力源研究的必要性與重要性。奠基於此研究,方能有助於未來相關研究的發展與實務應用。

並列摘要


The problem of job stress has always been explored and examined by behavior researchers. It is an important issue in the field of occupational health psychology. In the Chinese context, workers have to view interpersonal issues as the primary task. If they cannot properly deal with an interpersonal problem, it will be difficult for them to complete their job tasks. Understanding the meaning and influence of interpersonal stressors is more important than job stressors for Chinese workers. Although some researchers have conducted studies about interpersonal stressors in the Western context, the results cannot be generalized to non-Western societies. Researchers have suggested that considering cultural values in interpersonal stressor research is a critical factor to solve this dilemma. Thus, this study adopts an inductive approach to offer a comprehensive definition of interpersonal stressors in Confucius-based societies. This study collects the interpersonal stressful incidents within the organiztions by Critical Incident Technique. 84 workers responded 272 descriptive interpersonal incidents. Interpersonal stressors include nine dimensions are found in this study. Four dimensions are etic dimesions and five dimension are emic dimensions. Finally, contributions and limiations are discussed. Overall, this study clarifies the concepts of interpersonal stressors in Chinese organizations. Cultural value should be considered in the interpersonal stressors research. Based on this study, suggestions are provided for furture studies and managerial implications.

參考文獻


黃光國(2001):〈儒家關係主義的理論建構及其方法論基礎〉。《教育與社會研究》,2,1-34。[Huang, . K. (2001). The theoretical construction of Confucian relationalism and its philosophical foundation. Formosan Education and Society, 2, 1-34. ] doi:10.6429/FES.200106.0001
楊中芳(1999):〈人際關係與人際情感的構念化〉。《本土心理學研究》,12,105-179 。[Yang, Z. F. (1999). Renji quanxi yu renji qinggan de gounianhua. Indigenous Puschological Research in Chinese Societies, 12, 105-179. ] doi:10.6254/1999.12.105
黃囇莉(1996):〈中國人的和諧觀/衝突觀:和諧化辯證觀之研究取徑〉。《本土心理學研究》,5,47-71。[Huang, L. L. (1996). Zhongguoren de hexieguan/chongtu guan: Hexiehua bianzhengguan zhi yanjiu qujing. Indigenous Puschological Research in Chinese Societies, 5, 47-71. ] doi:10.6254/1996.5.47
彭泗清(1993):〈中國人「做人」的概念分析〉。《本土心理學研究》,2,277-314。[Peng, S. Q. (1993).Zhongguoren zuoren de gainian fenxi. Indigenous Puschological Research in Chinese Societies, 2, 277-314. ] doi:10.6254/1993.2.277
高鳳霞、鄭伯壎(2014):〈職場工作壓力:回顧與展望〉。《人力資源管理學報》,14(1),77-102。[Kao, F. H., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Job stress in workplace: Review and extension. Journal of Human Resource, 14(1), 77-101. ] doi:10.6147/JHRM.2014.1401.04

被引用紀錄


傅佳君(2022)。國小教師人際關係量表之編製學校行政(142),141-160。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.202211_(142).0007
吳蕙如、沈緯鈞、廖主民(2023)。歸屬需求量表中文化編製與法則網絡體育學報56(3),299-317。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202309_56(3).0004
游立宇、吳宗祐、高鳳霞、駱皓正(2021)。忍一時風平浪靜,退一步海闊天空?華人組織中的人際壓力因應中華心理學刊63(1),41-72。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.202103_63(1).0003
程雅妤、張素惠、莊謹鳳、王智弘(2022)。華人文化脈絡下高中職輔導教師多重角色衝突倫理判斷歷程之研究中華輔導與諮商學報(65),27-62。https://doi.org/10.53106/172851862022090065002

延伸閱讀