透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.72.53
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

民主社會的菁英統治:對密爾《論代議政府》的一個詮釋

Elite Government in a Democratic Society: An Interpretation on J. S. Mill's Considerations on Representative Government

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文從密爾寫作的企圖與策略理解其民主理論代表作《論代議政府》。密爾試圖以文字論述說服社會接受他的政治理念,因此在論述策略上,為了讓社會大眾對其理論能夠同情理解,並接受其理論,密爾採用了迥異當今學術規格的論述方式。他首先推崇民主政治的優越,討好群眾的認同,再逐步對人民質素低落的問題進行批判,以迂迴的論述引導群眾接受他菁英色彩濃厚的主張。學者由於未能掌握密爾寫作的企圖與策略,對其民主理論多所誤解,或者以為密爾一味推崇民主政治的理想,或者以為他是反民主的菁英論者,或者是認為他的論證中存在著民主政治與菁英統治的矛盾。事實上,民主政治對密爾而言,已不是理想,而是必須檢視的政治現實;他承認民主政治有其優越之處,也尊重主權在民的事實,因此他不是反民主論者;密爾嘗試解決民主社會與菁英統治的緊張關係。《論代議政府》一書其實是他說服英國民主社會接受菁英統治的大膽論述。

並列摘要


This essay interprets John S. Mill's most important writing of democratic theory, Considerations on Representative Government, with a view of his intention and strategy in writing. I argue that with the intention of acquire empathic understanding and acceptance from the British mass Mill adapts a peculiar kind of rhetoric strategy. Praising first the ideal of democracy to greet the mass, then revealing step by step their insufficiency in both intelligence and character, Mill tried to lead them to accept his elitist mode of democracy. Scholars who missed Mill's intention and strategy of argument in this writing regarded him either as an enthusiastic partisan for democracy, an anti-democratic elitist, or a theorist who offered no solution to the contradiction between democracy and elitism. However, Mill is not an enthusiastic partisan for democracy, for democracy, in his view, was no more an ideal, but an essential political reality that should be examined. Nor is he an anti-democrat, for he respects the fact of popular sovereignty. Finally, Mill did offer his solution to the contradiction between democracy and elitism. In fact, Considerations on Representative Government as a whole should be considered as his daring enterprise persuading democratic British to accept elitist government.

參考文獻


Arneson, Richard J.(1982).Democracy and Liberty in Mill's Theory of Government.Journal of the History of Philosophy.20,43-64.
Burns, J. H.(1957).J. S Mill and Democracy, 1829- 61 (I).Political Studies.5(2),158-175.
Burns, J. H.(1998).John Stuart Mill's Social and Political Thought,vol. III.London:Rutledge.
Burns, J. H.(1957).J. S. Mill and Democracy, 1829-61 (II).Political Studies.5(3),281-294.
Burns, J. H.(1998).John Stuart Mill's Social and Political Thought: Critical Assessment, vol. III.London:Rutledge.

被引用紀錄


張玲玲(2017)。代議政治與參與式預算之競合─以臺北市參與式預算為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201702456
駱怡辰(2012)。Mill的選舉制度及其政治思想:兼對當代的反思〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.01992
黃雅雯(2013)。統治菁英與臺灣全民運動政策變遷─以馬英九執政時期之改善國民運動環境與打造運動島計畫為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0801201418033415
林廷霖(2014)。女性菁英政治參與之分析-以臺北市第十一屆(2010~2014年)女性議員為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613585484

延伸閱讀