透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.119.66
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

文官政治認知是否與行政中立行為衝突?2008年臺灣政府文官調查的初探性分析

Are the Political Understandings of Bureaucrats Incompatible with the Weberian Model of Administrative Neutrality? A Study on the 2008 Taiwan Government Bureaucrat Survey

摘要


本研究基於循證研究(evidence-based research)的立場,意圖從2008年台灣文官調查的資料,以價值衝突的角度,透過探索性因素分析、皮爾森積差相關分析與結構方程模型等方法,檢視台灣文官行政行為中是否存在政治認知與行政中立行為的價值競逐與衝突。根據分析結果,本研究的模式與研究假設均獲得資料的支持:全台灣的文官系統,特別是委任的文官,其偏差的政治認知對其行政中立的行為有直接且負面的影響效果。最後,本研究根據研究結果提出未來研究的建議。

並列摘要


This paper attempts to address the research question: ”are political understandings of the bureaucrats incompatible with the Weberian model of administrative neutrality” by analyzing data from the 2008 Taiwan Government Bureaucrat Survey (TGBS) using exploratory factor analysis, Person's correlation and structural equation modeling (SEM) statistical techniques. Analysis on overall effect not only demonstrates that the theoretical model fits well but also indicates that the partisan political understandings of the bureaucrats leads to a significant negative effect on administrative neutrality. Finally, policy recommendations and a future research agenda are discussed in the conclusion.

參考文獻


陳敦源、呂佳螢(2009)。循證公共行政下的文官調查:台灣經驗的觀點、方法與實務意義。公共行政學報。31,187-225。
洪永泰(2005)。台灣地區各種抽樣調查各種母體定義、抽樣底冊與涵概率的比較。調查研究。18,9-44。
Finer, H. 1941. “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government.” Public Administration Review 1(4): 197-218.
Friedrich, C. J. 1940. “Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility.” Public Policy 1: 3-24.
Levitan, D. M. 1942. “The Neutrality of the Public Service.” Public Administration Review 2(4): 317-323.

延伸閱讀