This article mainly responds to Wut Tai Shing's 'On Thomé H. Fang's interpretation of Huayan thought', arguing that in comparison with 'how' did Fang interpret Huayan, 'why' Fang interpreted Huayan in the way he did is more important, which brings the whole discussion from a descriptive level to a more explanatory dimension. This article further argues that Fang interpreted Huayan from his own perspective of 'philosophy of comprehensive harmony', that provides an alternative focus of study about the relationship between Fang and Huayan thought.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。