透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.140.198.43
  • 期刊

我們沒有共同的未來:西方主流“環保”關懷的政治經濟學

We Do Not Have a Common Future: The Political Economy of the Dominant Environmental Concern in the West

摘要


自從1987年出版以來,《我們共同的未來》(Our Common Future)一書就得到全球許多國際機構、政府、民間組織與學術界的重視,該書書名所表彰的價值也成了環保論述的主流價值。然而,本文指出,該書雖然正確的點出了許多當前全球環境問題的社會、經濟與政治根源,它所開的處方卻因為缺乏政治經濟學的分析與視野而淪為空泛與不切實際的口號,甚至可能更加速環境的破壞。本文從環境社會學的角度來探討當前全球有關環境保護的論述、政策及其影響,主張環境問題是個特定於階級、族群、地域的問題,因此,解決之道也必須是相對應的。若未能針對這些特殊的問題來討論,則非但不能解決問題,反而很可能更造成強勢者壓迫弱勢者的後果,因而更導致環境的加速惡化,保育的企圖有了適得其反的結果。環境保護必定是關乎政治經濟的,類似「我們共同的未來」這般全體主義的思考方式與相應政策只能加深,而不是解決全球多數人所真正關切的環境問題。同時,根據過去的失敗經驗,本文主張唯有兼顧基本資源權與人權保障的環境保護政策,才有可能是成功的政策。

並列摘要


Since its publication in 1987, Our Common Future has attracted the attention of many international organizations, governments, NGOs, and the academics; the values inherent in the book have also become the dominant values of environmental discourse. This article maintains that while the book correctly identifies many socio-economic-political roots of global environmental problems, its solutions lack a political-economic perspective and result in empty slogans, if not greater environmental destruction. Applying environmental sociological perspective, this article discusses global environmental discourse, policy and their effects, and argues that environmental problems are problems specific to class, ethnic groups and territory, which require corresponding solutions. If we fail to see this point, we will not only be unable to deal with environmental problems properly, but may also result in furthering the oppression of the dominant groups over other groups, thereby accelerates environmental destruction. Environmental protection must be about political economy, universalistic thinking such as ”our common future” will only deepen, not solve environmental problems that the majority of the people concern. This article strongly asserts that only by taking into account the protection of basic human rights and resource rights can environmental protection measures become successful.

參考文獻


(1995).Environmental Justice: Issues, Policies, and Solutions.Washington, D. C.:Island Press.
(1993).Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots.Boston:South End Press.
(1993).Toxic Struggles: The Theory and Practice of Environmental Justice.Philadelphia:New Society Publishers.
Adams, W. M.(1990).Green Development: Environment and Sustainability in the Third World.London:Routledge.
Beck, U.(1991).Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.London:Sage Publications.

被引用紀錄


李尚軒(2014)。從山林開發與榮民安置到觀光發展-以戰後棲蘭山開發與轉型為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.00991
胡育堃(2010)。找尋公共領域在台灣的實踐—以「節能減碳」為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.00328
黃慧真(2007)。廖鴻基海洋書寫研究(1995-2007)〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2007.00804
蘇芳韻(2005)。由溫泉觀光開發現況探討原住民部落發展困境之研究—以泰安溫泉為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2005.00033
潘佳汝(2007)。台灣地區高中職校長生態之研究〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/NCNU.2007.00042

延伸閱讀