透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.109.5
  • 期刊

魚與熊掌:女性主義反性暴力論述之困境與省思

A Review of Western Feminist Dilemma in Sexual Assault Prevention Discourse

摘要


本文旨在藉由西方女性主義在性暴力防治上的論述困境,激發國內各界對本土性侵害防治理論與實踐的省思與討論,以促進台灣社會性侵害防治的性別平權與文化多元。鑑於國內性侵害防治主流論述與正規教育所隱含之性別偏見,個人取向與缺乏(教學)共識等問題,本文主張以西方女性主義反性暴力論述發展困境為「他山之石」,激發本土社會對性侵害防治建構的典範轉移,藉以提昇國內性侵害防治實踐的性別平權與文化多元。 女性主義的反性暴力論述,雖與廣為流傳的強暴迷思產生爭霸的效應,但也同時陷入論述之困境,例如:1.受暴恐懼引發之失能效應;2.受暴女性的自我認同:受害者vs.倖存者;3.強暴因應的個別差異,抗拒vs.屈從;4.強暴防制的社會控制:受害人控制vs.加害人控制vs.女性自我防衛;及5.受暴創傷的霸權化及醫療化。據此,本文提出若干性暴力防治意義建構之因應議題如下:1.強暴之文化解構與重構; 2.「強暴抗拒」的多元界定;3.「女性防暴」的性別規範;4.自我防衛與自我賦權;及5.男性防暴的集體責任,以嘗試回應當前女性主義反性暴力論述之困境,並期以激發國內各界對本土性侵害防治理論與實踐之省思與討論。基於上述議題所隱含的另類性別意識型態,國內社群的共識或異議可能引發台灣社會性侵害防治論述的典範轉移與防治資源的重新分配。

並列摘要


To promote gender equity and multi-cultural thinking in the indigenous practice of sexual assault prevention in Taiwan, this article reviews several discursive dilemma among Western feminists, including: 1) rape fear and fear immobility; 2) self-identity of rape victims; 3) individual differences in rape resistance; 4) social control in rape prevention; and the hegemonization and medicalization of rape trauma. In an effort to cope with these dilemma and to engage in paradigm shift in sexual violence education in Taiwan, this study identifies the following issues for public discussion: 1) cultural de-construction and re-construction of sexual violence against women; 2) multi-cultural definition of rape resistance; 3) gender control implications in rape prevention; 4) the embodiment of empowering in women's self-defense training; and 5) male collective responsibility in rape prevention.

參考文獻


Bart, P., O''Brien, P.(1985).Stopping rape: Successful survival strategies.Elmsford, NY:Pergamon.
Bartky, S.(1990).Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression.New York:Routledge.
Biden, J. R.(1990).The Violence Against Women Act: 1990. 10 October (legislative day, 2 October).Washington, DC:U. S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office.
Bordo, S.(1993).Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body.Berkeley:University of California Press.
Brison, S. J.(1998).Violence against women: Philosophical perspectives.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.

被引用紀錄


黃楷婷(2015)。婦女的親密關係暴力迷思與父權主義之關係-以屏東縣為例〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2015.00066
林佩儀(1999)。三位童年性侵害女性成人復原歷程研究--以社會文化脈絡觀點詮釋之〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1804200714353678
林昱貞(2000)。性別平等教育的實踐:兩位國中女教師的性別意識與實踐經驗〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2603200719105922
方嘉珩(2007)。心理專業助人者的價值信念對性別角色態度與強暴迷思關係之調解作用研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2910200810572932
林珮珊(2010)。網路論壇中的強暴討論串分析—以PTT的女性性版為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2506201011290900

延伸閱讀