他的性騷擾?她的性騷擾?：性騷擾的性別化建構

His Sexual Harassment vs. Her Sexual Harassment: Gendered Construction of Sexual Harassment

羅燦煐(Tsun-Yin Luo)

《台灣社會研究季刊》 46期 (2002/06) Pp. 193-249

https://doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.200206.0006

摘要

國內性騷擾研究多依循行為學派的實證量化取向，著重對性騷擾行為及心理層面的量化探討，可能忽略國內對性騷擾的本土性界定及性別化建構。本研究採取言談分析法，檢視十八個焦點團體的訪談資料，探討男女大學生對性騷擾概念的界定，認定，歸因，與創傷論述。言談分析顯示，男女兩性對性騷擾的建構有其共通及差異之處。共通之處在於對性騷擾概念的化約式界定，但對（自身經歷）事實認定的精緻複雜。此外，男女兩性對性騷擾的建構差異相當多元，含括對性騷擾的命名基礎，認定標準，歸因論述，心理創傷，因應處境等。本研究發現，受訪者對性騷擾的性別化建構傾向複製父權意識型態，及深化女性抗拒性騷擾的劣勢處境。基於上述發現，本研究針對國內性騷擾實務處遇，學術研究，及社會教育等面向，提出省思及建議。

關鍵字

性騷擾建構 ； 性別差異 ； 言談分析

並列摘要

This study employed discourse analysis to examine the social construction of sexual harassment among university students and employees in Taiwan. This study conducted 18 focus groups to gather discursive data on the definition, naming/recognition, attribution, and impact of sexual harassment. The analysis reveals that, although men and women share similar definition and recognition of sexual harassment, the discourse for naming, attributing, trauma and coping of sexual harassment is a gendered construction, which tend to reproduce patriarchal ideology and oppress women's agency in responding to sexual harassment. Implications for case counseling, research strategies, and social intervention of sexual harassment in Taiwan are discussed.

並列關鍵字

sexual harassment ； gendered construction ； discourse analysis

參考文獻

Berdahl, J. L., Magley, V. J., Waldo, C. R.(1996).The sexual harassment of men? Exploring the concept with theory and data.Psychology of Women Quarterly.20

Bingham, S. G.(1997).Conceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practice.Westport, Connecticut:Praeger.

Burgess, A. W., Holmstrom, L. L.(1974).Rape trauma syndrome.American Journal of Psychiatry.131

Claire, R. P.(1998).Organizing silence: A world of possibilities.NY:State University of New York Press.

Ferguson, K. E.(1984).The feminist case against bureaucracy.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.