The purpose of this research is to study: (1) the difference in technique between male and female badminton players, (2) the relation of technique and scoring between male and female badminton players, (3) the distribution and distinction of miss types in various techniques between male and female badminton players, (4) the comparison of non-oppressive misses between male and female badminton players. The research is based on the top 8 players in the 1999 Taipei Badminton open. Conclusions are as follows: (l) There are differences in the frequencies of using clear, drop and underhand drop shot in each rally between male and female. (2) There is an important discovery in the coefficient of correlation between scoring and techniques. There are five variables (smash success, serve success, lob fault, net shot success, miss) in which both male and female players reach significant (p<.05). Only male players can reach significant (p<.05) in two variables (smash fault, non-oppressive miss), and in the three variables (net smash success, serve fault, clear fault) do only female players can reach significant. (p<.05). (3) The percentage of each miss type are as follows: misjudge accounts for 5.7%, footed-dragging 27.2%, mishit 36.7 % and outside 30.4%. There are no distinction in the distribution of frequency in each miss type between male and female badminton players. (4) As far as all types of misses are concerned, the frequency of non-oppressive misses accounts for 24.8%, and the percentage of each non-oppressive miss are as follows: smash accounts for 36.1 %, drop 24.5%, misjudge 22.8%, serve 11.8% and net smash 4.8%. The are no distinction in the frequency distribution in non-oppressive missed between male and female players. There are difference in the frequencies of oppressive miss between male and female.
The purpose of this research is to study: (1) the difference in technique between male and female badminton players, (2) the relation of technique and scoring between male and female badminton players, (3) the distribution and distinction of miss types in various techniques between male and female badminton players, (4) the comparison of non-oppressive misses between male and female badminton players. The research is based on the top 8 players in the 1999 Taipei Badminton open. Conclusions are as follows: (l) There are differences in the frequencies of using clear, drop and underhand drop shot in each rally between male and female. (2) There is an important discovery in the coefficient of correlation between scoring and techniques. There are five variables (smash success, serve success, lob fault, net shot success, miss) in which both male and female players reach significant (p<.05). Only male players can reach significant (p<.05) in two variables (smash fault, non-oppressive miss), and in the three variables (net smash success, serve fault, clear fault) do only female players can reach significant. (p<.05). (3) The percentage of each miss type are as follows: misjudge accounts for 5.7%, footed-dragging 27.2%, mishit 36.7 % and outside 30.4%. There are no distinction in the distribution of frequency in each miss type between male and female badminton players. (4) As far as all types of misses are concerned, the frequency of non-oppressive misses accounts for 24.8%, and the percentage of each non-oppressive miss are as follows: smash accounts for 36.1 %, drop 24.5%, misjudge 22.8%, serve 11.8% and net smash 4.8%. The are no distinction in the frequency distribution in non-oppressive missed between male and female players. There are difference in the frequencies of oppressive miss between male and female.