透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.189.2.122
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

不同教學、知識創造管理模式對國中生數學學習成效之影響研究

How Different Teaching and Knowledge-Creating Management Models Affect Students' Math Learning in Junior High

摘要


本研究旨在探討不同教學、知識創造管理模式之「數學解題策略」-「教室文化與氣氛」構面及「教學知能與知覺」構面在後測、延後測的差異情形,不同測量階段對「數學解題策略」之後設解題的影響情形,「數學解題策略」前測、後測對兩構面後測、延後測的數學學習成效預測情形。為達上述目的,本研究以中部地區三所國民中學、六個國中七年級班級,每班學生人數約30 人左右,共180 人,進行實驗教學,每所學校兩個班級,並以班級為單位,採立意取樣,一班為實驗組,另一班則為控制組,並以研究者自編之「數學解題策略」量表為研究工具,將資料蒐集結果以SPSSWIN進行二因子共變數分析、重複量數分析及多元逐步迴歸分析。本研究結果發現: (一)不同教學、知識創造管理模式之「數學解題策略」-「教室文化與氣氛」構面及「教學知能與知覺」構面在後測、延後測,皆表現出顯著性差異。 (二)不同教學、知識創造管理模式在不同測量階段對「數學解題策略」之後設解題產生顯著性差異。 (三)不同教學、知識創造管理模式之「數學解題策略」前測、後測對兩構面後測、延後測的數學學習成效,產生顯著性預測效果。

並列摘要


The purpose of this research is to examine the interaction of the Mathematical problem solving strategy with different teaching and knowledge-creating management models. The researcher examined the differences between post and retention tests in terms of the classroom culture and atmosphere and in terms of teaching intellectual capacity. Also examined were the effects on the tests at different times and on the prediction in mathematical learning efficiency after using the Mathematical problem solving strategy. There were 180 seventh grade students from six classes in three junior high schools in middle Taiwan participating the teaching experiment. Each school provided 2 classes with about 30 students each. The researcher used a class as a unit and assigned them to treatments randomly with one being the experimental group and the other the control group. The researcher implemented the Mathematical problem solving strategy scale model himself, collected the information and conducted a two-way ANCOVA, repeated measures analysis and multiple stepwise regression with SPSSWIN. The results of combining the Mathematical problem solving strategy with different teaching and knowledge-creating management models shows: 1. Significant differences in posts and retention tests in terms of classroom culture and atmosphere and in terms of teaching intellectual capacity. 2. Significant differences in tests at different times after using the Mathematical problem solving strategy. 3. Significant prediction after using the Mathematical problem solving strategy.

參考文獻


程炳林(2002)。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報。47(1),39-58。
程炳林、林清山(2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。中國測驗學會測驗年刊。48(1),1-41。
楊榮祥、Fraser, B.(1998)。台灣和西澳科學教室環境的合作研究-研究架構、方法及對台灣科學教育的省思。科學教育學刊。6(4),325-342。
張景媛、呂玉琴、何縕琪、吳青蓉、林奕宏(2002)。多元思考教學策略對國小教師數學教學之影響暨教師專業成長模式之建構。教育心理學報。33(2),1-22。
Armstrong, T.(1994).Copyright by Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

被引用紀錄


戴世紘(2007)。無所不在的學習成效之實證研究- 以大一資管系Java程式設計課程為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200700830
陳隆榮(2013)。建構個人行動學習系統評鑑指標〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2013.00271
蔡富元(2011)。知識創造行為與科技學習成效關係之研究-以e-Learning學習活動為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315224945
吳志榮(2015)。補習班學生學習成效影響因素探討-國內某國、高中文理補習班之實證研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2502201617124946

延伸閱讀