透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.20.56
  • 期刊

某醫學中心試辦出院準備銜接長照2.0計畫成效初探

Outcome of Discharge Planning Linked to Long Term Care 2.0 Project in a Medical Center

摘要


本研究目的在探討某醫學中心試辦出院準備銜接長照2.0計劃之成效。以橫斷面研究法,調査2017年6月至9月試辦與非試辦單位轉介照管中心個案數、與轉介率,收集與分析轉介個案之基本資料、轉介單與照管中心回覆單,以及個管師之記錄,發現試辦病房轉介51人,轉介率為5.23%,非試辦單位轉介41人,轉介率為0.1%,兩者呈現顯著差異。申請長照服務,以居家服務最多(58.8%),其次輔具購買租借(54.9%)、喘息服務(51.0%)與交通接送(49.0%);但通過核定項目以喘息服務(65.0%)最多,其次交通接送(55.0%)、居家服務(50.0%)與輔具租借購買(40.0%)。出院後取消申請服務達31人,主因服務需求、資格和服務期待不符(38.7%)。以受訓合格專人協助銜接長照2.0計劃,確能提升轉介率,建議運用資訊系統估算合乎收案條件者,並參考個案管理時間來估算人力;同時,簡化評估量表,授予醫院核定部分服務項目,應有助於出院準備銜接長照2.0計畫之推動。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcome of discharge planning linked to Long Term Care 2.0 project. From June to September 2017, we compared the transfer amount and rate between wards with and without specialized case manager (SCM). Patients' basic data, transferring sheet, and feedback sheet from long term care management center (LTCMC) collected. In addition, the case managers' records also included as study materials. There were 51 patients referred to the LTCMC of SCM wards, and the referring rate was 5.23%. The outcome was significantly higher than the other wards (41 patients, 0.1%). The applied services included care services (58.8%), assistive device purchases or rental (54.9%), respite care services (51.0%), and transportation services (49.0%). However, the LTCMC certified finally were mainly respite care (65.0%), transportation care services (55.0%), care services (50.0%), and assistive device purchases or rental (40.0%). The factor ranked first among the patients not receiving the services was financial factor and services linkage availability (38.7%). Having a specialized case manager did provide more referred patients and referred rates on discharge planning linked to long term care 2.0 project. We suggested the requirement of manpower could estimate the numbers of patients who fit the service criteria by informatics system and consider the consuming time of case management process. Meanwhile, simplify the evaluation scale and authorizing the hospital SCM to approve some service items would be helpful for the project.

參考文獻


黃昌彬、吳宜芳、彭薇勻:安心返家 談出院準備及居家護理。人醫心傳-慈濟醫療人文月刊 2017;16-9。[Huang CB, Wu YF, Peng WY: Talk about discharge plan and home nursing care. Tzu Chi Medical Care 2017;16-9.]"
呂怡蓁、劉淑娟:淺談台灣長期照顧管理中心面臨的困境-以組織及人員為主。源遠護理 2013;7:15-21。[Lu YC, Liu SJ: Challenges of Structure and Human Resources in the Long Term Care Management Centers in Taiwan. Yuan-Yuan Nursing 2013;7:15-21.]"
蔡玉霞、彭馨穎、江佩珊等:長期照顧管理中心的服務滿意度調查。台灣醫學 2015;19:335-45. [Tsai YH, Peng HY, Jiang PS, et al: A Satisfaction Survey of Municipal Long-Term Care Management Centers. Formos J Med 2015;19:335-45.]"
詹惠雅、張瑛、周桂如:超長住院個案之出院準備服務。台灣醫學 2005; 9:96-101。[Chan H Y, Chang Y, Chou KR: Discharge planning for hospital patients who overstay. Formos J Med 2005;9:96-101.]"
Gonçalves-Bradley DC, Lannin NA, Clemson LM, et al: Discharge planning from hospital. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016."

被引用紀錄


尹銘芳、丁施丹、謝佳穎、詹惠雅、潘信良、林瑛釗、林綉珠、劉秀雲(2022)。提升病人轉銜長照2.0成效之計畫台灣醫學26(2),210-219。https://doi.org/10.6320/FJM.202203_26(2).0010
徐鈺婷、林雅慧(2023)。利用行動科技改善髖部骨折術後護理指導之改善專案領導護理24(2),160-174。https://doi.org/10.29494/LN.202306_24(2).0012

延伸閱讀