民主的公民教育與多元文化教育之重探

The Re-analysis of Democratic Civic Education and Multicultural Education

劉姝言(Shu-Ian Liou)

《課程與教學》 11卷4期 (2008/11) Pp. 1-25

https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200811.0001

摘要

本文首先介紹民主憲政的基礎－自由主義，並討論其與社群主義、多元文化主義間的論戰，藉以分析民主的公民教育與多元文化教育之別。民主的公民教育目標除了內化憲政民主邏輯，還包含積極自主自治的目標。多元文化論述在憲政民主的架構下可以區分三種“經濟因素的弱勢、因為身分／文化在主流社會的弱勢，以及與憲政民主價值衝突的族裔團體。這三種反映在教育層面，經濟與文化／身分造成的弱勢，應屬民主的公民教育範疇，若將其歸類為多元文化教育，容易使公民教育的角色弱化，從而錯失解決社會議題的關鍵。最後，若與民主價值衝突的少數族裔要與大社會公平合作，則須轉化自我文化價值，與民主政治相互連結，這是未來臺灣多元文化教育應該發展的方向。

關鍵字

憲政民主 ； 公民教育 ； 多元文化教育

並列摘要

The article first introduces the base of constitutional democracy and liberalism, and then discusses the arguments between liberalism, communitarianism and multiculturalism, in order to distinguish between civic education and multicultural education. The goals of democratic civic education include internalizing the logic of constitutionalism and cultivating students' ability to rule and discipline themselves. There are three kinds of multicultural discourse: the disadvantage group caused by the economic factor, the minority group of identity, and the ethnic-group whose core value conflicts with democracy. Civic education covers the first two categories. If they are defined as multicultural education, then schooling will miss the key to solving social issues. If the ethnic-groups want to cooperate with others in a democratic society, they must try to transform their cultural norm and relate it to democracy. This is the goal of multicultural education in Taiwan.

並列關鍵字

constitutional democracy ； civic education ； multicultural education

參考文獻

張建成(2007)。獨石與巨傘－多元文化主義的過與不及。教育研究集刊。53(2)，103-143。

許育典、周敬凡(2006)。從德國聯邦憲法法院「頭巾判決」論學校的宗教中立。台大法學論叢。35(6)，117-167。

駱明慶(2002)。誰是台大學生？－性別、省籍與城鄉差距。經濟論文叢刊。30(1)，113-147。

Banks, J.A.(1988).Multicultural education: Theory and practice.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.

Banks, J.A.(1994).An instruction to multicultural education.MA:Allyn & Bacon Need-ham Heights.