Chinese Revision of the “Psychological Well-Being Scale”

「心理幸福感量表」之中文化驗證

林志哲(Chih-Che Lin)

《測驗學刊》 62卷4期 (2015/12) Pp. 261-277

摘要

本研究之主要目的在驗證「心理幸福感量表」（PsychologicalWell-BeingScale，簡稱PWBS），以建立適用於臺灣地區之中文版。本研究將Diener等人（2009,2010）所發展之「心理幸福感量表」翻譯修訂為中文，以大學生及成人為對象，選取154人依序完成「心理幸福感量表」、「生活滿意度量表」、「正向情感量表」、「負向情感量表」、「自尊量表」，以及「憂鬱量表」之填答，並將所得資料用以檢驗中文版量表之信效度。在效度方面，本研究經驗證性因素分析結果支持8題的PWBS中文版為具有合理適配之單因素結構。其次，PWBS與生活滿意度、正向情感及自尊等構念皆具有顯著正相關，而與負向情感及憂鬱等構念則呈現顯著負相關，此顯示PWBS中文版具有良好的效標關聯效度。在信度方面，PWBS中文版亦具有高度的內部一致性及穩定的再測信度，此顯示量表信度良好。綜言之，PWBS中文版應可作為適用臺灣地區測量心理幸福感構念的簡短式研究工具。

關鍵字

心理幸福感 ； 正向心理學 ； 測量

並列摘要

The main purpose of this study was to establish Chinese version of the Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS) in Taiwan. A total of 154 participants were recruited for the current study and they completed the PWBS, life satisfaction, positive affect, negative affect, self-esteem, and depression questionnaires. Result of confirmatory factor analysis supported the one-factor model of the PWBS with adequate values of various fit indices, revealing that the 8 items of the scale were homogeneous for measuring psychological well-being. In addition, the PWBS had a positive relationship with life satisfaction, positive affect, and self-esteem, and a negative one with negative affect and depression, which supported its construct validity. Furthermore, the PWBS had satisfactory internal consistency and stability, which supported its good reliability. All the findings showed that the PWBS was an adequate short-form measure of psychological well-being in Taiwan.

並列關鍵字

measure ； positive psychology ； psychological well-being

參考文獻

Lin, C.-H.,Chen, Y.-F.,Yeh, Y.-H.,Hsu, C.-L.,Sun, C.-T.(2008).The development and psychometric study of Tung's Depression Inventory for College Students.Psychological Testing.55(3),509-533.

Arrindell, W. A.,Heesink, J.,Feij, J. A.(1999).The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1,700 healthy young adults in The Netherlands.Personality and Individual Differences.26,815-826.

Bentler, P. M.,Chou, C.(1987).Practical issues in structural modeling.Sociological Methods and Research.16,78-117.

Bentler, P. M.,Wu, E. J. C.(1983).EQS/Windows user's guide.Los Angeles, CA:BMDP Statistical Software.

Chiu, C.,Yang, C. F.(1987).Chinese subjects' dilemmas: Humility and cognitive lazin-ess as problems in using rating scales.Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society.18,39-50.