透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.8.110
  • 期刊

國中生認知/意動成份與學習表現之相關研究

Relationship among Junior High School Students' Cognitive/ Conative Components and Learning Performance

摘要


本研究的目的如下:(1)瞭解四個認知成份變項與四個意動成份變項之關係。(2)探討八個認知/意動成份變項對國中學習表現的預測力。(3)探討認知/意動成份是否能將受試者區分成明顯的集群。受試者來自八所國中共687人,他們接受閱讀理解測驗(丙式)、策略覺察量表、學習策略量表、情意反應量表、學習動機量表、行動導向量表、行動控制策略量表之施測。研究發現如下:(1)認知成份四個變項與意動成份四個變項彼此可以互相解釋大約56%左右的變異量。意動成份對訊息處理策略和後設認知策略的解釋力比較高,認知成份對學習動機和行動控制策略的解釋力比較高。(2)認知/意動成份八個變項可以聯合解釋國中生學習表現總變異量的54%,其中內容知識是學習表現最有力的預測變項。(3)認知/意動成份四個因素可以將全體受試者區分成三個特性明顯的集群。

並列摘要


The purposes of this study were: (1) to explore the relationship among students' cognitive and conation variables, (2) to explore the effect of cognitive/conation variables on students' learning performance, and (3) to group observations into clusters by cognitive/conation components.Participants were 687 students from eight junior high schools. The instruments employed in these studies included: Reading Comprehension Tests (form C), Index of Reading Strategies Awareness, Learning Strategies Inventory, Affective Response Inventory; Learning Motivation Inventory, Action Orientation Inventory, and Action Control Strategies Inventory. The results of this study were as follow: (1) There were significant canonical correlation between cognitive components and conation components. The redundancy indices were 29.75% ai1d 26.44%. (2) There were significant multiple correlation between cognitive/conation variables and learning performance. The cognitive/conation variables explained about 54% of the overall variance of learning performance. (3) The cluster analysis showed that subjects could be grouped into three clusters by cognitive/conation components.

參考文獻


Ackerman, P. L., Woltz, D. J.(1994).Determinants of learning and performance in an associative.Journal of Educational Psychology.86(4),487 - 515.
Ames, C.(1992).Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology.84(3),261 - 271.
Ames, C., Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes.Journal of Educational Psychology.80(3),260 - 267.
Armbruster, B. B.(1988).Why some children have trouble content area textbooks.
Bandura, A.(1991).Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.50,248 - 287.

被引用紀錄


黎芝伶(2012)。媒體傳播策略運用與觀賞動機暨行為研究-以淡江大學賽博頻道為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.00226
黃雅鈴(2009)。國中學生所知覺的導師班級經營效能、學生自我概念與學生學習動機之關聯性研究-以桃園縣為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200900834
羅廷瑛(2003)。兩種建構取向教學模式對國小學生「自然與生活科技領域」科學學習表現之影響〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2603200719134612
吳玉萍(2011)。國中班級社會環境營造方案成效之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315253981
陳銘村(2016)。原住民成人學習者社會支持、自我效能與學習動機關係之研究〔博士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614061622

延伸閱讀