教育決策權力的正當性：決策倫理及其典範的討論

The Power Legitimacy of Policy-Making in Education: In Discussion with Ethics of Policy-Making and Its Paradigm

黃乃熒(Nai-Ying Whang)

《師大學報：教育類》 46卷1期 (2001/04) Pp. 1-19

https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200104.0001

摘要

本文旨在分析教育決策權力正當性的意義，及其對教育決策系統的影響。結果發現教育決策權力的正當性乃可增進決策的倫理，進而促進教育組織的革新。此外，透過教育決策典範的知識活動與決策權力正常性關係的分析，發現教育決策實體的主體性、相互依賴性以及人造性，可以增進教育決策權力的正常性。由於實體的主體性，會融攝多元立場的價值及情感，進而透過藝術性的行動，來提升教育決策權力的正當性；實體的相互依賴關係性，會促進元素間的互相滲透關係，進而透過解構的行動，來增進教育決策權力的正當性；實體的人造性，會促進發現共同的需要，進而透過社會問題解決的行動，來提升教育決策權力的正當性。因此藝術性的行動、解構的行動與社會問題解決的行動，可以增進教育決策權力的正當性。

關鍵字

教育決策 ； 權力正當性 ； 倫理 ； 典範

並列摘要

This study is to inquire the influence of power legitimacy in policy-making in education. It is found that power legitimacy of policy-making in education can promote the quality of justice ethics and care ethics. Also, this study is to discuss the approaches of policy-making in education, including logical positivism paradigm, hermeneutic paradigm, and critical theory paradigm, which influence power legitimacy of policy-making in education. As a result, it is found that subjective, interdependent, and artificial construction of reality will help enhance power legitimacy of policy-making in education. Based on the analysis, this study suggests that the action of art, deconstruction and social problem-solving should be emphasized.

並列關鍵字

Policy-Making in Education ； PowerLegitimacy ； Ethics ； Paradigm

參考文獻

Adams, G. B.(1992).Comments on Golembiewski Vs Ostrom. Olympia..The Evergreen State College..

Apple, M. W.(1993).Offical knowledge:Democratic education in a conservative age..New York,NY:Routedge.

Argyris, C.,Schon, D.(1978).Organizational learning:A theory of action perspective..Reading,MA:Addison-Wesley.

Bachrach, P.,Baratz, M. S.(1962).American Political Science Review.

Bateson, G.(1972).Steps to an ecology of mind..New York:Ballantine Books.