透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.118.244
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

投票與不投票的抉譯-2004年總統大選與公民投票的探索性研究

To Vote or Not to Vote, That is the Question: An Exploratory Analysis of the Presidential and Referenda Vote in Taiwan

摘要


本文主要目的在於探討為何在2004年台灣總統大選與公民投票合併舉行時,兩項選舉的投票率有明顯的落差,是哪些因素影響總統大選的高投票率以及公民投票的低投票率?本文分析TEDS 2004年總統大選面訪資料發現,影響選民參與總統大選以及公民投票的因素是相當不同的,在總統大選方面,對於不同候選人的利益落差以及教育程度是具有影響力的變數,而政治效能感以及動員則沒有影響力,本文以為這是因為在台灣的投票成本相對較低的緣故。在公民投票方面,對於不同候選人的利益落差、政治效能感以及動員皆對於民眾的參與具有影響。另一方面,本文試圖探索不希望公民投票通過的選民,是否會依據對於現實世界可能發生狀況的不同判斷,而做出棄權或是投反對票的不同選擇。結果發現,這兩種投票決定對於不希望公民投票通過的選民來說,是差異不大的。

並列摘要


The goal of this paper is exploring why-despite the referenda and presidential election being jointly conducted-there is a huge gap between the turnout rates for the presidential election and referenda vote in Taiwan in 2004. After analyzing the 2004 TEDS presidential election survey data, the authors find that the determinants of whether to vote or not in the presidential election and referenda are different. For the presidential election, differential benefit and level of education are influential factors while political efficacy and mobilization are not. The authors suspect that the high turnout rate of the presidential election in Taiwan results from the relatively low cost of voting. For the referenda: differential benefit, political efficacy and mobilization are all influencing factors. On the other hand, the authors attempt to explore whether the difference between abstention and voting no-for those who do not want the referenda to pass-depends on their perception of the state of the world. The result is that this variable fails to explain the choice of voting no. The research findings infer that for those who do not want the referenda to pass, the choice of abstention and voting ”no” does not make a difference.

參考文獻


Abramson, Paul R.,John H. Aldrich(1982).The Decline of Electoral Participation in America.American Political Science Review.76(3),502-521.
Aldrich, John H.(1993).Rational Choice and Turnout.American Journal of Political Science.37(1),246-278.
Craig, Stephen(1979).Efficacy, Trust and Political Behavior: An Attempt to Resolve a Lingering Conceptual Dilemma.American Politics Quarterly.7(2),225-239.
Craig, Stephen,Michael Maggiotto(1982).Measuring Political Efficacy.Political Methodology.8(3),85-110.
Downs, Anthony(1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy.New York:Harper & Row.

被引用紀錄


邱貿凱(2014)。總統立委選舉競爭程度對民眾醫療使用之影響:以2012年總統立委大選為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.02627
周敬濤(2011)。投票率高誰得利?台灣總統選舉投票率與得票率的分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.10365
林醒亞(2009)。公民投票與政黨競爭:臺灣公投併大選之分析(2004-2008)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.01004
郭銘峰、詹富堯、王鼎銘(2013)。規範認知與實然參與的罅隙:臺灣民眾在直接民主治理機制下的分析政治學報(56),27-54。https://doi.org/10.6229/CPSR.2013.56.02
李怡秋(2007)。電子投票與民主參與 -以英國之實驗經驗為借鏡〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0207200917345529

延伸閱讀