透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.41.214
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

選舉輸家與民主鞏固-台灣2004年總統選舉落選陣營對民主的態度

Election Losers and Democratic Consolidation: The Election Losers' Attitudes toward Democratic Ruling Party in the Taiwan 2004 Presidential Election

摘要


民主體制具有脆弱性,選民透過選票所作出的集體決定,可能製造民主鞏固難以超越的障礙。選舉結果使選民被區分爲贏家與輸家,選舉輸家對民主體制的支持態度,通常會比較不明確或不堅定。所以,民主體制得以運作與持續的原因,並不在贏家的勝利,而是在輸家的自我克制。輸家必須接受令其反感的選舉結果,以及造成如此結果的民主程序。本文從對民主的認同與對民主體制表現的評價這兩個面向,建構一個台灣社會對民主支持的不同類型,以此比較選舉贏家與輸家在民主支持態度上的差異。本文的研究結果顯示,選舉結果所產生的勝選陣營與敗選陣營,的確在民主支持的態度上具有差異。對選舉輸家而言,比較多的人屬於民主批評者;其次是民主反對者,只有很少的人屬於民主支持者。對選舉贏家而言,也是有比較多的人屬於民主批評者,但比例上少很多;其次是民主支持者。在控制其它因素下,仍然發現選舉的輸家與贏家,是解釋不同的民主支持類型最重要的因素。此外,台灣社會對民主體制的表現反應出高度的不滿,這與目前西方國家的研究發現很類似,但批判性公民的出現是民主鞏固與深化不可或缺的正面力量。然而,比較令人憂心的發現是,對國家整體經濟情況的評價,與對民主支持的態度之間,具有微弱的相關性。這種微弱的相關,日後是否會因台灣經濟持續的惡化而被強化,值得我們後續的觀察與分析。

並列摘要


Democratic systems contain the inherent weakness that collective decision making through the ballot box can itself create tension by dividing the electorate into winners and losers and creating a conflict of interests between these two groups. Amongst the losers, who are forced to accept unfavorable electoral results and the democratic procedures which follow, support for the system may consequently be low and unstable, meaning that the success and persistence of any democracy is based not on the success of the winners, but rather on the self-restraint of the losers. This paper creates a measure of support for democracy in Taiwanese society by looking at temporary democratic commitments and evaluation of ruling party performance, in order to investigate the differences between the winning and losing groups. The results show that, with other variables remaining constant, election results strongly influence support for democracy in Taiwanese society. Amongst the losers, very few can be considered supporters of democracy, and most are critical. Amongst the winners, there are also many who are critical; however, a far greater proportion, are supportive of, or submissive to, democracy. Citizens' needs and criticisms of democracy are an essential element to democratic consolidation. A further disconcerting finding is that the worsening state of the national economy may be eroding support for democracy in Taiwan. Whether the factors identified in this paper will contribute to the weakening or otherwise of Taiwanese democracy is certainly a question worth further research and analysis.

參考文獻


Almond, Gabriel A.,Sidney Verba(1963).The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
Anderson, Christopher J.,Andre Blais,Shaun Bowler,Todd Donovan,Ola Listhaug(2005).Losers' Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy.New York:Oxford University Press.
Bratton, Michael,Peter Lewis(2006).The Durability of Political Goods? Evidence from Nigeria's New Democracy.(Paper presented at the 20th International Political Science Association World Congress).
Bratton, Michael,Robert Mattes(2001).Support for Democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or Instrumental?.British Journal of Political Science.31(3),447-474.
Bratton, Michael,Robert Mattes,E. Gyimah-Boadi(2005).Public Opinion, Democracy and Market Reform in Africa.New York:Cambridge Univesity Press.

被引用紀錄


林昭揚(2013)。選舉輸家政治態度與行為之探討:以台灣2012年總統選舉為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.00056
王宇婷(2018)。臺灣民眾對我國實施民主的評價變遷~2001-2014 年四波調查的分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201800669
黃佳婷(2017)。當代台灣青年的政治參與:從批判性公民的角度分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201704127
林秉儀(2017)。首次政黨輪替後臺灣民眾對報紙與電視媒體的信任變遷及原因探索~2001-2014年四波調查的分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703233
盧秉謙(2016)。民主意識與兩岸經貿:臺灣民眾貿易態度的分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201701036

延伸閱讀