透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.22.181.209
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

單一選區兩票制下的一致與分裂投票-2008年立法委員選舉的探討

Straight-and Split-Ticket Voting under the Mixed-Member Majoritarian System in Taiwan: An Analysis of the 2008 Legislative Election

摘要


2008年立委選舉改採單一選區兩票制,讓台灣選民首度有機會針對同一職位投下兩張選票。本文利用民意調查資料與多層模型的建立,檢視選民採取一致與分裂投票的各種型態及其影響因素。研究結果發現,有高達76.5%的選民採取一致投票,其中47.6%一致投給國民黨,28.7%一致投給民進黨,台聯及客家黨的一致投票則僅合佔0.2%。而採取分裂投票的選民,不論「有無機會」採取一致投票,都出現以藍綠光譜爲主的「聯盟投票」型態。此外,策略投票不但發生在小黨認同者的第一票身上,在政黨票上也會有策略投票的考量,甚至部分國民黨或民進黨認同者,在聯盟席次最大化的考量下,也會將政黨票轉投給同聯盟小黨。多層模型的結果則顯示,年紀愈輕、政治知識愈高,以及對選區候選人的偏好與自身黨性相衝突的選民,皆有顯著偏高的相對機率採取分裂投票。黨性愈強,採取分裂投票之相對機率也愈低。至於當選區中有脫黨參選或強勢獨立候選人參選時,選民即有顯著偏高的相對機率採取分裂投票,凸顯出個人選票在單一選區中的影響效果。而在農業人口比例愈高、政黨版圖勢力愈不明顯的選區,選民採取分裂投票的相對機率也愈高。

並列摘要


The 2005 constitutional amendment in Taiwan adopts a new mixed-member majoritarian (MMM) electoral system to replace the single nontransferable vote (SNTV) system for legislative elections. The election of the 7th Legislative Yuan held on January 12 of 2008 marked the beginning of a new era of Taiwan's legislative politics since it was the first ever election in Taiwan under the MMM system. Each voter cast two votes: one for the single-member district (SMD) candidate, and the other for the party list. It is interesting to ask how voters allocate their two ballots. This paper analyzes patterns and determinants of straight-and split-ticketing in Taiwan's 2008 election with a multilevel model which integrates individual-level survey data and district-level macro variables. We find that straight-ticket voting is dominant (76.5%), with the KMT claimed 47.6%, the DPP obtained 28.7%, and other small parties, only 0.2%. As to split-ticket voting, the pattern tends to follow the party coalitions of the blue versus green camp. Furthermore, we find that not only small party identifiers tend to vote strategically for the major party candidates of their own ”color” camp, as Duverger's law predicts, but some major party identifiers also vote tactically for small parties of their camp on the PR ballot in order to maximize the total number of seats of their preferred coalition. Our multilevel model reveals that, at the individual level, voters who are younger, with higher political knowledge, weaker partisanship, and do not like their parties' nominees are more likely to split their tickets. At the district level, on the other hand, voters who reside in districts with candidates broken off parties or with strong independent candidates are more likely to cast split tickets. This is an indication that personal voting still plays a role in SMD ballots.

參考文獻


吳重禮(2008)。政黨偏好、制衡認知與分裂投票—2006年北高市長暨議員選舉的實證分析。台灣民主季刊。5(2),27-58。
游清鑫(2004)。分裂投票解釋觀點與台灣選舉之應用—以2002年高維市長與市議員選舉爲例。台灣政治學刊。8(1),47-98。
王業立、彭怡菲(2004)。分裂投票—一個制度面的分析。台灣政治學刊。8(1),3-45。
蕭怡靖(2009)。「台灣選舉與民主化調查」之政黨認同測量的探討。選舉研究。16(1),67-93。
黃紀、王鼎銘、郭銘峰(2008)。「混合選制」下選民之一致與分裂投票—1996年日本眾議員選舉自民黨選票之分析。選舉研究。15(2),1-36。

被引用紀錄


林珮霖(2017)。第九屆立法委員選舉民進黨艱困選區提名策略之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201702968
江冠瑩(2016)。我國立委選制與台灣團結聯盟轉型之研究(2001∼2016)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201603186
周佑政(2016)。太陽花學運後台灣新興政黨的形成與發展 -時代力量黨與社會民主黨的個案研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201602760
范恩邦(2014)。臺灣單一選區兩票制之研究:以第七、八屆立委選舉為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.10231
陳彥夫(2013)。第七屆立委選舉分裂投票探索-空間分析的方法〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.01027

延伸閱讀