精神分析取向心理治療與詮釋現象學的辯證關係：精神分析臨床研究的困境與解決

The Dialectic Relationship between Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy and Hermeneutic Phenomenology: Dilemmas and Solutions in Psychoanalytical Clinical Research

洪雅琴(Ya-Chin Hung) ； 李維倫(Wei-Lun Lee)

《中華輔導學報》 22期 (2007/09) Pp. 157-183

https://doi.org/10.7082/CARGC.200709.0157

摘要

本文論述精神分析臨床研究的困境，並借助詮釋現象學取徑，為精神分析準備一個有別於直接訴諸臨床經驗的知識方法。精神分析的理論歸納無法達到實證主義對於可驗證性與推論的要求，使得精神分析在科學界的地位備受質疑。同時，由於精神分析的實踐知識屬性，也讓實證檢證工作格外困難。為了避免精神分析理論被詬病為「套套邏輯」，本文嘗試透過詮釋現象學方法的迂迴，來達成對精神分析理論的檢查與討論。本文認為精神分析的語言學特徵提供了其與詮釋現象學的接合點。作法上則是，先把精神分析理論放入括弧內，透過詮釋現象學的操作，繞道於文本分析，以檢視精神分析理論所指向的現象結構。
在實徵討論上，本文將以「相互構成」作為精神分析和現象學之間相互勾連的橋樑。精神分析的「投射認同」與現象學的「相互構成」都是談人和他者共同構成某種關係，只是現象學的「相互構成」對人內在的東西存而不論。本文最後也會交待精神分析臨床研究中，研究者兼任治療師的雙重角色問題，釐清研究者如何掌握其角色定位的關鍵與原則，以避免落入「套套邏輯」的研究窘境。

關鍵字

投射認同 ； 相互構成 ； 詮釋現象學 ； 精神分析

並列摘要

This article explores the dilemmas of psychoanalytical clinical research and also intends to propose a method which is differentiated from that based on clinical experiences with the help of hermeneutic phenomenology. Psychoanalysis structures its theory by clinical research; however, it cannot meet the requirements of verification and deduction in terms of empirical science. In addition, the practice traits of psychoanalysis make verifying empirical evidence difficult. For these reasons, psychoanalysis is not easy understood and accepted within the scope of academic research. In order to shed the impression of ”simple logical thinking”, this article attempts to provide a platform for examining psychoanalytical theory through hermeneutic phenomenology.
In the empirical discussion, this article focuses on bridging psychoanalysis and phenomenology based on ”co-constitution”. This article suggests that ”projective identification” of psychoanalysis and ”co-constitution” of phenomenology are refering to how people co-constitute a certain relationship. The difference is that the ”co-constitution” of phenomenology believes the existence of human Beings' inner thoughts but it does not address those. In the last part, the problem of dual roles of a researcher and a therapist is discussed as well in order to clarify how the researcher controls keys and rules of her role positioning so that it is not trapped in the research dilemma of ”simple logical thinking”.

並列關鍵字

co-constituting ； hermeneutic phenomenology ； projective identification ； psychoanalysis

參考文獻

李維倫(2004)。以置身所在作爲心理學研究的目標現象及其相關之方法論。應用心理學研究。22，157-200。

Alvesson, M.,Skoldberg, K.(2000).Reflective methodology: New vistas for qualitative research.London:Sage.

Bachrach, H.,Weber, J.,Solomon, M.(1985).Factors associated with the outcome of psychoanalysis.International Review of Psychoanalysis.31,196-199.

Bateman, A.,Holmes, J.(1995).(Introduction to psychoanalysis contemporary theory and practice).

Breuer, J.,Freud, S.(1895).Studies in hysteria.London:Hogarth.