透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.176.66
  • 期刊

對內田周平的重新認識

Towards a New Understanding of Uchida Syuhei

摘要


過去,對於世界上第一部《中國哲學史》的作者內田周平評價並不高,主要是因爲這部問世於十九世紀末的書不夠「哲學」。如果重新審視內田周平的學問以及他對當時「哲學」的代表井上哲次郎的批判,我們認爲有必要重新評價此人。首先,內田周平對宋代理學的研究有真知灼見;其次,他對井上哲次郎的批判有其合理性。因此內田周平對漢學立場的堅守,並不能簡單視爲落後、保守的行爲。透過內田周平的生平,我們可以看出日本的中國哲學研究在十九世紀末二十世紀初特殊的發展歷程,對於我們今天重新審視中國哲學學科自身具有重要意義。

並列摘要


In the past, the evaluation of the first book in the world on the history of Chinese philosophy Zhongguo Zhexueshi by Uchida Syuhei was not high. It is mainly because the book published in the nineteenth century was not considered "philosophical" enough. If we re-examine Uchida Syuhei's scholarship as well as his critique of Inoue Tetuzirou, the representative of "philosophy" at the time, we will find it necessary to reappraise Uchida's works. First of all, Uchida Syuhei has a penetrating insight into research on the School of Principle (Lixue) in the Song Dynasty. Secondly, his critique of Inoue Tetuzirou is rational. Uchida Syuhei's firm standpoint in the field of Sinology therefore is actually not backward and conservative. Through the biography of Uchida Syuhei, we can see a unique process of the development of Chinese philosophy in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century Japan. It is significant and helpful for us to reexamine today's discipline of Chinese philosophy.

參考文獻


藤井倫明(2011)。被遺忘的漢學者:近代日本崎門朱子學者內田周平學思探析。中正大學中文學術年刊。2011(1)
井上哲次郎 INOUE, Tetsujiro 1891a 〈性善惡論〉,《哲學會雜誌》,第4 冊第47、48 號(1891年1 月、2 月)。“Seizen'akuron,” Tetsugakkai zasshi, Vol. 4, No. 47 & 48 (Jan. & Feb., 1891).
井上哲次郎 INOUE, Tetsujiro 1891b 〈再ビ性善惡ヲ論ジ併セテ内田周平君ニ答フ〉,《哲學會雜誌》,第5 冊第51、53 號(1891 年5 月、7 月)。“Futatabi Seizen'aku o ronji awasete Uchida Shūhei kun ni kotau,”Tetsugakkai zasshi, Vol.5, No. 53 & 54 (May. & Jul., 1891).
内田周平 UCHIDA, Syuhei 1891 〈井上文學士ノ性善惡論ヲ讀ム〉,《哲學會雜誌》,第5 冊第50 號(1891 年4 月)。“Inoue bungakushi no Seizen'akuron o yomu,” Tetsugakkai zasshi, Vol. 5, No. 50 (Apr., 1891).
内田周平 UCHIDA, Syuhei 1911 〈德育問題に就て〉,《東洋哲學》,第18 編第10 號(1911年11 月)。“Tokuiku mondai ni tsuite,” Tōyō tetsugaku, Vol. 18, No. 10 (Nov., 1911).

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量