選手知覺教練領導行為、團隊衝突、團隊凝聚力與滿意度關係之研究

A Related Study among Coaches' Leadership Perceived by Players, Team Conflict, Team Cohesion and Satisfaction in Taiwan

吳慧卿(Hui-Chin Wu) ； 鄭志富(Chih-Fu Cheng)

《臺灣體育運動管理學報》 2期 (2003/11) Pp. 124-147

摘要

本研究旨在瞭解大學院校桌球選手知覺的教練領導行為、團隊衝突、團隊凝聚力及滿意度間之影響路徑。其次，根據典型相關分析結果，建立桌球選手所知覺的教練領導行為、團隊衝突發生原因、衝突處理方式、團隊凝聚力及滿意度之結構方程模式。研究對象為227名臺灣地區大學校院桌球選手，並以自編之『大學校院桌球隊團隊內部運作調查問卷』為研究工具進行調查。根據調查所蒐集之資料，經典型相關分析(Canonical Correlation Analysis)及結構方程模式(Structural Equation Modeling，SEM)等統計方法處理，結果發現：選手知覺的教練領導行為對團隊衝突發生原因、衝突處理方式、團隊凝聚力及滿意度均可有效解釋，其各別解釋力為28%、19.1%、30.1%、36.4%。其次，團隊衝突發生原因對於衝突處理方式、團隊凝聚力、滿意度亦均可有效解釋，其分別解釋力各為5.2%、15.5%、10.7%。此外，衝突處理方式對團隊凝聚力及滿意度均可有效解釋，其分別解釋力為29.5%、19.5%；再者，滿意度亦可有效解釋團隊凝聚力，其解釋力為44.7%。而選手知覺的教練領導行為、團隊衝突發生原因、衝突處理方式、團隊凝聚力及滿意度間之結構方程模式，主要是藉由選手所知覺到的非專制式的教練領導行為之展現，影響選手對於『領導與團隊』的滿意度，進而影響團隊凝聚力的作用力會達到最大。

關鍵字

運動教練領導行為 ； 團隊衝突 ； 團隊凝聚力 ； 選手滿意度 ； 結構方程模式

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to understand the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) among coaches' leadership, the causes and solutions of team conflict, team cohesion perceived by the table tennis players. The studying subjects were 227 university tennis players in Taiwan, and the self-edited ”Questionnaire of Internal Operation of University Tennis Teams” was used as the studying tool for investigation. Based on the collected data, through Canonical Correlation Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and the like statistical methods, the results showed: Coaches' leadership perceived by the players could effectively explain the causes and solutions of team conflict, team cohesion and satisfaction. The respective explaining capabilities were 28%, 19.1%, 30.1% and 34.4%. Secondly, the causes of team conflict could also effectively explain the solutions of team conflict, team cohesion and satisfaction. The respective explaining capabilities were 5.2%, 15.5% and 10.7%. Beside, the solutions of team conflict could effectively explain team cohesion and satisfaction as well. The respective explaining capabilities were 29.5% and 19.5%. Last, satisfaction could also effectively explain team cohesion. The respective explaining capability was 44.7%. The Structural Equation Modeling among coaches' leadership perceived by the players, the causes and solutions of team conflict, team cohesion and satisfaction mainly affected players' satisfaction to ”leader and team”, so as to reach the maximum influence on team cohesion, through coaches' non-despotic leadership perceived by players.

並列關鍵字

coach leadership behavior ； team conflict ； team cohesion ； athletics' satisfaction ； Structural Equation Modeling SEM

參考文獻

蔣憶德、陳淑滿、葉志仙(2001)。教練領導行爲與團隊凝聚力之相關研究。體育學報。30，195-206。

Wu, K. H.(2000).A competitive study of collegiate coaches' leadership behavior in Taiwan.Abstract of North American Society for Sport Management 15th Annual Conference.(Abstract of North American Society for Sport Management 15th Annual Conference).

Schreisheim, B. S.(1987).Relationship between the congruence of preferred and actual leader behavior and subordinate satisfaction with leadership.Journal of Sport Psychology.10,157-166.

Slack, T.(1997).Understanding sport organizations: The application of organization theory.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.

Weiss, M, R.,Friderichs, W. D.(1996).The influence of leader behavior, coach attributes, and institution variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball teams.Journal of Sport Psychology.8,332-346.