透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.107.96
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

Popular Understandings of Democracy and Regime Legitimacy in East Asia

並列摘要


This essay uses the latest Asian Barometer survey data to explain how popular understanding of democracy affects regime legitimacy in Asia. Our findings indicate that Asian citizens who possess a procedural understanding of democracy are less supportive of the current political regime. This finding appears in both the micro- and macro-analyses. Furthermore, we found modern social values and liberal orientation to be significant factors in reducing diffuse regime support. These results could be explained by the perspective of critical citizenship or social conformity. However, we also found supporting evidence for the conventional wisdom concering democratic citizenship at the microand macro-level. The overall conclusion suggests that the source of regime legitimacy stems from multifarious factors and that different theoretical claims could simultaneously have a certain level of explanatory power. Moreover, a further analysis suggests that social conformity could generate habitual psychological attachment to the incumbent political authority and thus increase regime legitimacy. Our investigation shows that this explanation has even greater empirical saliency than theories of democratic citizenship and critical citizenship.

參考文獻


Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America: Volume II, trans. Henry Reeve, ed. Phillips Bradley (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1945 [1840]).
Adcock, Robert,Collier, David(2001).Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.American Political Science Review.95(3),529-546.
Barber, Benjamin(1984).Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age.Berkeley:University of California Press.
Bovard, Everett W.(1953).Conformity to Social Norms and Attraction to the Group.Science, New Series.118(3072),598-599.
Bowler, Shaun,Donovan, Todd(2002).Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government.British Journal of Political Science.32(2),371-390.

被引用紀錄


徐子軒(2012)。國家民主化之國際社會化研究:台灣、貝南與保加利亞的比較分析〔博士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.01204
官晴(2016)。後列寧半總統制政體的憲政轉型與民主表現 外力、經濟、民族主義激蕩下的變奏: 台灣、俄羅斯、蒙古〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201602641

延伸閱讀