理解式球類教學與傳統式教學應用在羽球教學對大學生學習反應之研究－以東海大學體育課羽球組爲例

Research on Students Reactions when Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) and Traditional Teaching Method Applied in University Badminton Classes-Use Tunhai University PE Badminton Classes as Examples

鄭金昌(Chin-Chang Cheng)

《臺大體育學報》 15輯 (2009/09) Pp. 43-62

https://doi.org/10.6569/NTUJPE.200909_(15).0003

摘要

目的：本研究旨探討理解式球類教學與傳統式教學應用在大學羽球課程，學生參與教學前後其學習動機與班級氣氛改變與影響。方法：本研究採用準實驗設計方式，以東海大學九十六學年度二年級兩班選修羽球課100位為實驗對象，採用問卷調查方式將蒐集資料，以t檢定比較兩班學生參與教學前後的改變，並比較其差異性。結果：兩班學生參與教學後對學習動機並未呈現顯著差異性，但對班級氣氛，理解式球類教學呈現出高於傳統式教學且達顯著性差異。結論：一、傳統式教學學生參與教學後其學習動機與班級氣氛的學習反應皆未達顯著差異。二、理解式球類教學學生參與教學後在學習動機未達顯著差異，對班級氣氛則達顯著差異。三、兩班學生參與不同教學後的學習動機未達顯著差異，但對班級氣氛，則呈現出理解式球類教學高於傳統式教學達顯著性差異。

關鍵字

理解式球類教學 ； 學習反應

並列摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to study the effect of Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) applied in university badminton classes. We compared students' differences in studying motivations, and also the class atmosphere before and after applying TGFU. We also compared Traditional Teaching Method as references. Methods: This research was conducted in a Quasi-experimental manner. Subjects were 100 sophomore students from two elective PE badminton classes in Tunghai University. We employed different teaching methodologies to the classes, and the results of study were evaluated. Data were collected through questionnaires. Students' reactions and differences were analyzed by applying the t-test. Results: After being taught by different methods, the results showed that no significant differences could be observed on students' studying motivations. However, applying TGfU generated significantly higher cognition toward the class atmosphere. Conclusions: 1. After applying the Traditional Teaching Method, students' studying motivations and class atmosphere were not significantly changed. 2. After applying the TGFU, even students' study motivations were not significantly changed, but the class atmosphere were significantly different. 3. After employing different teaching methods, students in two classes, whose studying motivations were not significantly changed, while class atmosphere was significantly different.

並列關鍵字

Teaching Games for Understanding ； Studying Reactions

參考文獻

廖智倩、闕月清(2008)。中學師生對理解式球類教學實施知覺之探討。臺中教育大學學報：教育類。22(1)，1-20。

Bunker, D.,Thorpe, R.(1982).A model for the teaching of games in secondary school.Bulletin of Physical Education.18(1),5-8.

Keh, N. C.,Tsai, T. D.,Huang, C. C.(2003).Teachers perceptions of and Attitudes towards Teaching Games for Understanding [Abstract]. Book of Abstracts.Melbourn, Australia: 2nd International Conference: Teaching Sport and Physical Education for understanding.(Melbourn, Australia: 2nd International Conference: Teaching Sport and Physical Education for understanding).

Turner, A. P.(1995).An Investigation into teaching game for understanding.North Carolina University.

Turner, A. P.,Martinek, T. J.(1992).A comparative analysis of two model for teaching games (technique approach and game-centered [tactical focus] approach).International Journal of Physical Education.29(4),15-31.