TSSCI論文品質之試探分析：管理學報個案解析

A Tentative Analysis on the Quality of TSSCI Journal Papers: A Case Study of the Journal of Management

劉任昌(Jen-Chang Liu) ； 葉馬可(Mark Yeats) ； 楊國良(Gwo-Liang Yang)

《科學與人文研究》 3卷4期 (2016/03) Pp. 1-38

https://doi.org/10.6535/JSH2016033401

摘要

國內的學術期刊生態，是學者之間苛刻地相互砍殺？抑或是期刊出版空間壟斷在少數人手中，形成所謂的學術派閥？對於上述問題，年輕或資淺學者充斥著抱怨，卻僅敢私底下嘆氣；少部分資深大老敢於公然指責，卻僅限於隱晦暗示。弔詭的是，社會科學研究者理應對社會現象好奇，對人文情境關懷，再透過學術著作討論、批判與交流，公然論述應該是社會科學家的責任與宿命；然而，卻從未有學者敢於公開陳述與其本身命運最相關的學術生態與學閥議題。本文作者率先起義，透過深度分析個案，對TSSCI期刊論文品質提出批判，分析面相包含非專業人士即可判斷文章良莠的形式面分析，以及攸關學術制度與學術文化的研究程序規範面分析，最後是攸關知識發展的實質內容分析。本文藉由實際案例證明，某些地位崇高之學術機構，其轄下學報刊登之部分文章品質卻也堪虞！長此以往，不難預期派閥生態或壟斷文化即將形成。本文作者決定藉由貢獻實際案例之分析，試圖喚起國內外學術管理機構對此現象之深刻注意。

關鍵字

技術位置 ； 技術角色 ； 網路結構 ； 社會網路分析 ； 結構對等性 ； 專利引用 ； 管理學報 ； 科技部 ； 自我抄襲 ； 學術倫理

並列摘要

In domestic academic circles, do scholars critically censure each other’s works? Or, is the opportunity to publish controlled by a clique of scholar-tyrants? Regarding these issues, young researchers make many complaints, but their criticisms are seldom aired beyond their immediate circles of colleagues and friends. Some famous senior scholars have criticized this culture, but fail to specify who the academic perpetrators actually are. Ironically, social scientists are, by definition, supposed to be curious about social phenomena and sympathetic to the humanities, which in turn triggers them to produce works discussing, criticizing, and debating with each other. However, no social scientist has ever publicly and explicitly examined those issues, which are, ironically, mostly apply to themselves. This paper responds to this cause and turns a critical eye in the direction of some TSSCI journal papers. We analyzed some works from a famous TSSCI journal from the perspective of basic skills, academic norms, and substantial knowledge. Some papers include contents that non-professionals can judge to be mistakes. Some published works have violated academic ethics, while some are riddled with erroneous information. This article sets out to prove that one specific academic institute dominates the academic circle in Taiwan. At the same time its publishing journal contains numerous works with serious errors. Along the way, it is very likely that some scholar-tyrants will rise up to dominate the academic circle. We take the first step to alert the academic world to this important issue by disclosing several real cases.

並列關鍵字

Technological position ； Technological role ； Network structure ； Social network analysis ； Structural equivalence ； patent citation ； Journal of Management ； Ministry of Science and Technology ； academic ethics ； self-plagiarism

參考文獻

劉任昌、葉馬可（2016）。評論臺灣股票市場價格群聚現象之研究。科學與人文研究，3(4)，39-62。 DOI: 10.6535/JSH2016033402

劉任昌、葉馬可（2014）。論文自我抄襲之定義與性質。科學與人文研究，3(1)，35-53。下載：http://ssrn.com/abstract=2576812

劉任昌、葉馬可、李世欽（2014）。國內期刊國際化之影響：以工業工程學刊為例。臺灣企業績效學刊，8(1)，35-55。

劉任昌、葉馬可（2015a）。引用錯誤、二次引用與對「臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫」之政策建議。圖書館學與資訊科學，41(1)，57-80。下載：http://140.122.104.2/ojs../index.php/jlis/article/view/646

翁順裕（2007）。從社會網絡分析觀點探討技術的趨同性—以保險商業方法專利為例。雲科大博士論文。