本研究運用教師協同教學模式,以設計概論課程為例,探討學生在專業理論各個單元之學習成效。為達研究目的,所使用研究工具有:「學生基本資料調查表」、「專業理論前後測預試量表」、「專業理論前後測正式量表」、「教師對協同教學歷程之感受與想法的訪談表」、「學生對協同教學歷程之感受與想法的問卷調查表」等。針對建國科技大學九十六學年度入學之日間部四年制一年級的商業設計系學生59人、空間設計系學生57人為研究對象。研究所得資料予以計算平均數、標準差,並以t考驗加以分析。具體而言,本研究獲致以下結論:1.學生基本資料的分佈狀況,以應屆畢業生、設計相關科別、父母職業從工者、父母教育程度屬中等教育者佔大多數。2.兩系學生在專業理論各個單元之前測結果,未達顯著差異水準,表示他們對設計概論課程之先備知識屬均質。3.協同教學模式之運用可以幫助學生對設計概論課程之專業理論的學習成效。4.協同教學模式運用於較能主動發問,並能提出問題討論之班級,其所展現的學習成效較好。5.師生對協同教學模式之運用的感受與想法均表示肯定的態度。
This research on the basis of the teachers' collaboratively teaching pattern, citing the schemingly generalizational program for instance, probed into the students' learning efficacy on each unit of the specialized theory. In order to achieve this researching purpose, the instruments this research utilized included: ”The students' fundamental data questionnaire.”, ”A table of pretest measure on ante/post test of specialized theory.”, ”A table of formal measure on ante/post test of specialized theory.”, ”A interview table of perception and idea on the collaboratively teaching course the teachers experienced and underwent.”, ”A questionnaire of perception and idea on the collaboratively teaching course the students experienced and underwent.” etc. This research was aimed at freshmen in educational system for four years at day-time section who were admitted to Chienkuo Technology University in 2007 academic year as researching subject and target. In total 116 freshmen compartmentalizing into two groups of which one group called commercial design department possessing 59 students while the other group christened spacial design department owing 57 students. Concretely speaking, acquiring the conclusively researching data to calculate average and standardized differentiation and using t-test to analyze each researching hypothesis would generalize following conclusions which were particularized at great length in detail:1. As far as dispersive condition on the basic information for students was concerned, the majority belonged to this year's graduates, designing's correlative sections, parents' occupation engaging in working task, parents' educational background pertaining to secondary education.2. That students in the commercial design department and students in the special design department on the ante test of each unit of socialized theory failed to reach significantly evident differentiation signified that their instinctive knowledge possessed homogeneity.3. It was of great assistance that application of teachers' mutually collaborative teaching pattern could promote learning efficacy of specialized theory of schemingly generalizational program for students in the above-mentioned two departments.4. That teachers' mutually collaborative teaching pattern was utilized on class which actively raised more questions and submitted queries for further discussion could manifest superior learning efficacy.5. It all denoted an affirmative attitude that both teachers and students perceived application of teachers' mutually collaborative teaching pattern.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。