透過您的圖書館登入
IP:44.211.91.23
  • 期刊

審議式民主在民主教育的實踐

The Practice of Deliberative Democracy in Democratic Education

摘要


民主教育旨在提升學習者的民主知識、民主素養以及民主技能,因此民主教育的實施內容,除了民主知識之外,亦應以適當方式增進受教者民主素養及民主技能。綜合理論及實踐經驗,透過參與民主審議的審議式民主,是其中一種可行的民主教育方式。審議式民主除了使參與者藉由參與不同的民主模式而重新評價民主,提升對民主活動的參與動機,亦可使其學習參與審議、問題解決,以及分析討論公共政策議題。然而,從民主教育的觀點來看,審議式民主也有一些隱憂,包括給予閱讀的資料是否中立、參與者是否都能理性討論、參與者是否都有議論能力、參與者的代表性與人數等問題。對此,欲以審議式民主實施民主教育的教育工作者及希望推廣審議式民主之團體與政府機關,可以下列方式處理問題:第一,提醒參與者,應認知資料與專家的說法未必中立,自己才是討論與決策的主體,應具有批判思考與獨立思考的能力。第二,應鼓勵參與者發言。試著從書寫帶動自己對討論議題的思考,或以發言單寫下個人意見後,與其他參與者交流意見。第三,提醒參與者,每個人(包括自己)都可能受到私利、偏見和意識形態的影響,所以應包容差異、寬容異議,彼此相互尊重。第四,提醒參與者,審議式民主並不強求共識,而且不只重視共識結果,也看重溝通過程。第五,考慮實施審議式民調,可參考瑞士科技評估委員會的做法,以使審議式民主之民主教育功能,能普及更多人民。

並列摘要


Democratic education aims at promoting the democratic knowledge, democratic literacy, and democratic skills of the students. Hence, the practical contents of democratic education shall adapt proper methods to enhance their democratic literacy, and democratic skills besides democratic knowledge. Deliberative democracy, which emphasizes both theory and practical participation of democratic deliberation, is a workable method. By participating in different models of democracy, the participants can reevaluate democracy as well as the way to participate in deliberation, problem solving, and how to analyzing issues of public policies.However, from the perspective of democratic education one may discover some malaises, such as the neutrality of the provided reading material, the possibility of rational discussions among participants, their discoursing ability, and representativeness of the participants and their numbers. Accordingly, educators who try to give deliberative democratic training and the organizations as well as the governmental institutes which wish to promote deliberative democracy may deal with these problems with the following methods. First, We should remind the participants that the provided material and the reasoning of the experts may not necessarily be neutral, and that they shall acknowledge themselves as the subjects of discussion, shall have critical and independent thinking. Second, We should encourage the participants to speak and take note of the important ideas of others. They shall try to organize their ideas by writing them down, and to share with others by using the opinion sheet. Third, We should bremind the participants that everyone (including themselves) might be influenced by private interests, bias, and ideology. They shall learn to tolerate differences and different opinions, and respect each other. Fourth, We should remind the participants that deliberative democracy does not insist on forming consensus. Rather, communication is more emphasized. Fifth, We should consider carrying out deliberative poll or referring to the Technological Review Committee of Switzerland, so that the educational function of deliberative democracy can be fulfilled by more people.

參考文獻


林國明、陳東升(2003)。公民會議與審議民主:全民健保的公民參與經驗。臺灣社會學。6,61-118。
張秀雄(2005)。民主與民主公民教育。公民訓育學報。16,113-138。
黃競涓(2008)。女性主義對審議式民主之支持與批判。臺灣民主。5(3),33-69。
陳東升(2006)。審議民主的限制:臺灣公民會議的經驗。臺灣民主季刊。3(1),77-104。
黃東益(2008)。審議過後─從行政部門觀點探討公民會議的政策連結。東吳政治學報。26,59-96。

被引用紀錄


周珮甄(2016)。開放政府政策的理念與實踐-以柯文哲執政臺北市政府為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU201601926
簡乃欣(2009)。高中職種子教師對審議民主融入課程的觀點研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315172427
許宏達(2015)。環境風險管制下民眾參與制度之法制研究-以環境災害敏感區為中心〔博士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614042442
陳潁峰(2020)。審議民主如何創造校園公民?以中國文化大學吸煙區規劃和英語畢業門檻之審議活動為例高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類(49),1-29。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20120111002-202012-202012280012-202012280012-1-29

延伸閱讀