當代臺灣如來藏思想的諍議與回應－印順之後的如來藏學諍議之評議

本文討論當代臺灣如來藏思想的諍議與其回應，臺灣如來藏思想的諍議是由印順的判教講起，而所謂的回應則討論了現有的幾種與如來藏思想相關的臺灣的佛學研究進路。本文分三節。在第一節之中，我闡釋佛教詮釋衝突的基本意涵，討論此中的如來藏說之諍議與其詮釋衝突的解決方式。首先，本文討論印順法師的如來藏說研究與當今佛教的詮釋衝突之解決的相關課題。其次，借用海德格（Martin Heidegger）與嘉達瑪（Hans-GeorgGadamer）的哲學詮釋學，來討論哲學詮釋的基本意涵與此中的詮釋衝突的解決方式；並討論了天臺佛教的佛性論的判教理論與佛教詮釋學對於詮釋衝突的解決。本文也由林鎮國的《空性與現代性》所提出的佛教詮釋學，來重檢如來藏批判的課題。在第二節之中，本文繼續討論了林鎮國《辯證的行旅》的解構思想與兩種詮釋學進路的視點下的如來藏思想批判。首先，本文從林鎮國《辯證的行旅》一書所繼續討論的佛教詮釋學的當代建構，來論述佛教詮釋學的當代新儒家哲學的佛學詮釋之批判，以及解構思想與佛教的本體詮釋學的當代哲學的意義脈絡。討論了上述的佛教詮釋學的研究進路之後，繼而，討論印順之後的另一端，檢視了蔡耀明的「內部建構」的佛學研究法。在本文第三節之中，則闡述了佛教之本體詮釋學的基本論題，由此概述關於當代如來藏諍議之回應，以及邁向當代如來藏學與佛教詮釋學的理論建構的我自己的進路。

關鍵字

1.如來藏思想； 2.印順； 3.佛教詮釋學； 4.天臺佛教

並列摘要

This article deals with the debates regarding tathagatagarbha thought in Taiwan's recent history. Debates regarding Tathagatagarbha thought in Taiwan stem from Yinshun's discussion of doctrinal classification. Responses to it discuss several different pre-existing approaches in Buddhist research relating to tathagatagarbha thought. The current article is in three parts. In the first part, I explain the essential implications of the Buddhist conflict of interpretations. In this I discuss the debate about tathagatagarbha thought and the way it resolves the conflict of interpretations. Most importantly, this section discusses Ven. Yinshun's research in tathagatagarbha thought and issues relating to the resolution of the conflict of interpretations. Next, this paper uses the philosophical hermeneutics of Heidegger and Gadamer to discuss the basic implications of philosophical hermeneutics and to resolve the previously mentioned conflict of interpretation. Moreover, this paper also discusses the doctrinal classification regarding the concept ofBuddha-nature in Tiantai Buddhism and the manner in which Buddhist hermeneutics resolves conflicts of interpretation. This paper also reexamines tathagatagarbha thought by using the Buddhist hermeneutics in Lin Zhengguo's Kongxing yu xiandai xing 空性與現代性 (Emptiness and modernity). In part two, of this paper continues to discuss tathagatagarbha thought by using deconstructionism and two approaches of hermeneutics in LinZhengguo's work, Bianzheng de xinglü 辯證的行旅 (Dialectical process). First, by using Lin Zhengguo's Bianzheng de xinglü tocontinue discussing the modern structure of Buddhist hermeneutics, this paperdescribes the criticism of modern Neo- Confucian philosophy against Buddhist hermeneutics, and the modern philosophical developments of deconstructionism and Buddhist ontological hermeneutics. Having discussed the above-mentioned developments in Buddhist hermeneutics, this paper continues by discussing the next stage after Yinshun, and examining the Buddhist approach of Cai Yaoming's Neibu jiangou 內部建構 (Inner structure). Part three explains the basic issues of Buddhist ontological hermeneutics, thereby generally describing the contemporary controversies surrounding tathagatagarbha thought, and moving toward a construction of my own approach regarding the theories of modern tathagatagarbha thought and of Buddhist hermeneutics.