透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.58.150.59
  • 學位論文

性侵害犯罪與保安處分—從強制治療出發

Sex Offenders and Security Measures—From Compulsory Treatment

指導教授 : 王皇玉

摘要


本文之研究目的在於檢視國內當前之性罪犯保安處分處遇制度,以探討現行法律制度面與實務運作面,是否存有盲點與缺失、是否符合治療性侵害犯罪人之近程目的與保安處分再犯預防的遠程目標。本文先從性侵害犯罪處遇史下手,進而探討各國比較法上之處遇制度,最後回到我國實務運作面,點出其所遭遇到的問題,再對照現行法律的規定,進而對現行法制規範提出檢討與建議,最後分析如此制度背後運作的社會背景與文化因素,從而試圖為性侵害犯罪人找到一個出口,使現行制度能更接近保安處分最初設置之目的,甚至真正達到「治療」的效果。   在第一章的前言部分,本文首先分析當前國內性罪犯社區處遇所發生的問題,說明自己的研究背景及動機,並介紹相關文獻對於該議題的見解,同時將研究的範疇加以界定,並建構整個研究的架構。   第二章為國外制度的介紹。針對前面章節所發現的問題,本文以國外對於性罪犯處遇著有成效的國家為對象,探討其所採納之相關制度的內涵及其具體作法,例如:美國梅根法案(性罪犯的登記與公告制度)、德國的社區監控措施、日本的認知治療模式,目的在於藉由國外制度的介紹,討論該等制度的優缺點,以評估是否適於作為我國建立性罪犯社區處遇措施的參考。   第三章和第四章回到我國法律與實務層面,分別分析國內刑法法修法前、後的法源比較,以及修法後現行強制治療實務運作現況,將分為獄中之強制治療與監獄外之強制治療,並略為論述其中之相關問題。   第五章和第六章則分別就法律與實施層面所面臨的問題,與國外的制度相比較之後,探討今後我國在性罪犯的各方處遇方面應有的改革方向。包括國外制度值得做為借鏡的具體措施,以及從性罪犯的再犯率窺視這些具體措施背後的真正問題。   最後第七章的部分導入社會學的研究,包括從女性主義、納思邦噁心理論的角度,探討性侵害強制治療背後真正的社會意義。並在最終的結論章做出本文最後的立法論建議,與本文個人的感想。

關鍵字

性侵害 保安處分 強制治療

並列摘要


The purpose of this study of sex offenders to view the nation's current security measures at the event regime, the current legal system to explore the practical operation of the surface and the surface, if there are blind spots and shortcomings, whether the purpose of treatment sex offender person with short-range security measures recidivism prevention of long-range goals. This start sex offender history at the event to start, then explore the comparative law of countries at the event system, and finally back to the practical operation of our face, they point out the problems encountered, and then control the provisions of existing law, and thus the current legal system specifications and recommendations of the review, the final analysis, the operation of such a system behind the social background and cultural factors, which attempts to find an outlet for the sex offender people make the existing system can be set closer to the original purpose of security measures, or even really "treatment" effect. In the first chapter, this paper first analyzes the current national sex offender community treatment with the problems, description of their research background and motivation, and describes the relevant literature for this subject see the solution, while areas of study should be defined and constructed the structure of the entire study. The second chapter is the introduction of the foreign regime. For the problems identified in the previous section, this paper at the hear of sex offenders abroad for effective targeted countries to explore the adoption of its content and its associated regime of specific practices, such as: the United States Megan Act (sex offender registration and notice regime), the German community control measures, the Japanese model of cognitive therapy, aimed at the introduction by foreign regime, the regime to discuss the strengths and weaknesses, to assess the suitability of establishing China as a sex offender community treatment measures reference. Chapters III and IV back to our laws and the practical level, respectively, of domestic criminal law before and after comparison of sources of law, and amending the law practice after the current operation of compulsory treatment status, will be divided into a mandatory prison outside of prison, forced treatment and treatment, and a little discussion in which the related issues. Chapters V and VI, respectively, on the face of legal and implementation aspects of clinical problems, and compared to foreign regime, the future of our country in all sex offenders should be at the event in the direction of reform. Including foreign regime should learn as specific measures, and recidivism rates of sex offenders from these specific measures to peep behind the real problem. The final part presents the sociological research, including feminist, society theory, and the treatment of sexual assault force behind the real social significance. And in the chapter to make a final conclusion on the end of this legislative proposal, and article of my feelings.

參考文獻


17.吳文正,《以性侵害犯罪防治法為中心探討刑事法學與精神醫學之交會與整合》,國立台灣大學法律學研究所博士論文,2005年。
41.鄭瑞隆,(少年性侵犯行之成因、評估與矯正處遇〉。
52.鄭瑞隆,〈少年性侵犯行之成因、評估與矯正處遇〉,《亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊》,2006年,頁62-95。.
50.鄭瑞隆,〈性侵害加害人評估處遇之理論分析與實務檢討:一個案例之分享〉,《亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊》,1卷1期,2005年12月。
38.陳筱萍、林耿樟,〈性侵害加害人在團體治療中的抗拒行為〉,《輔導季刊》,44卷2期 ,2008年6月,頁18-26。

被引用紀錄


翁筱珊(2012)。論精神病患強制治療制度之爭議及其合憲性-以我國精神衛生法為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.01649
楊凱傑(2016)。刑後強制治療制度的探討─以人身自由保障為中心〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614042549
張捷安(2016)。性侵害加害人執行刑後強制治療保安處分之現況與困境〔博士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614061185

延伸閱讀