統包建築工程都市設計審議期程之風險管控 －以台北市為例

The Study of Schedule Risk for Urban Design Review in Design-Build Building Construction

吳佰玲(Pai-Ling Wu)

指導教授 ： 郭斯傑

國立臺灣大學/工學院/土木工程學研究所/碩士(2007年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.01358

摘要

近年來，統包工程之案量及規模有大幅成長之趨勢。然而，在執行統包建築工程專案管理實務，有關進度管理要項中，規劃設計階段之督導乙方辦理建管行政作業變數最大，甚至造成無法滿足統包工程限期完工之要求，大大的影響統包工程可縮減工期之效益。檢討原因為乙方常常忽略及忽視公部門即契約第三人之審查期程。因都市設計審議為建築工程請照行政程序之要項，故期程影響最大。但乙方為符限期完工之要求，常壓縮決標文件之都市設計審議期程，致造成與實際都市設計審議期程差距頗大。
本研究範圍包含「地下停車場」、「辦公室」、「運動中心」、「展覽館」及「住宅」等5種公共建設類別，都審案准予核備期間為自2002年到2007年1月之案件。研究對象以工程採購二億元以上之巨額採購、契約型式為統包建築工程(PCM+監造)、或執行落後因素為都市設計審議時程進度落後之案件為限。
本研究藉由文獻回顧、15個統包工程都市設計審議案例調查及分析、歸納影響統包工程都市設計審議期程原因、綜整出都市設計審議期程落後因子及合理都市設計審議期程之對策，提出都市設計審議期程管控策略，經過專家訪談分析，依案例平均時程及都審次數推估之期程，較符合統包工程實際之都市設計審議合理期程。經本研究案例分析結果，建立統包工程依審議次數定出都市設計審議之合理期程。提供甲方將都市設計審議之合理期程列為統包工程評分要項，並作為契約分段履約期限。於統包招標文件要求乙方須對都市設計審議合理期程提出詳細評估，針對個案特殊議題預判因應作為及額外期程，作為評分要項及作為管控依據。

關鍵字

統包工程 ； 建築工程 ； 都市設計審議 ； 限期完工 ； 期程管控策略

並列摘要

In recent years, the case’s quantity and scale of the design-build construction had tendency of the large growth. However, to carryout design-build construction in practical professional management for those items in schedule management, the most concerned reason is the variation of the building administration superintend by the proprietor in the schematic design stage. Even causes the unsatisfied reason that had been requested to finish in a set time and tremendous influence the benefit of design-build construction. That may reduce the time-limited for a project. The self-criticism reason is the investigation time of the government authority (the third party in the contract) that have been neglected and ignored frequently by the proprietor. Because the urban design review is the important item in the administration procedure for the building construction. Although the time influence is the biggest, but the proprietor always requests contractor to finish by a set time, and compress the urban design review schedule in the bidding document. That creates a lot of difference between the actual urban design review schedules.
This research scope contains 5 public construction categories; include “the underground parking garage", "the office", "the sport center", "the exhibition hall" and "the housing”. These cases have been approved from the year of 2002 to 2007, January. These research objects are limited in purchase amount over $NT two hundred million, the contract pattern belonging to design-build construction type (the PCM+ site supervision), or the reason of the execution backwardness factor being as the urban design review schedule fallen behind.
This research studied by the literature review from, the investigation and the analysis of 15 design-build construction cases in urban design review, the induction influence reason of the design-build construction in urban design review schedule, the synthesis backwardness factor and the countermeasure of the reasonable time in urban design review schedule. That will propose the strategy through the analysis of specialists’ interview, the estimation schedule duration and frequency in urban design review. In order to, get a reasonable urban design review schedule. It will establish the urban design review reasonable schedule of the design-build construction project from the number of times through this research case analysis result. It will provide the proprietor a grading item from the urban design review reasonable schedule, and set a proper contract time-limited section. It will request the contractor to propose a detail analysis about the urban design review reasonable schedule in the tender document. In order to, make the proper action and extra schedule in advance by the special case prejudgment, and also being as the grading item and the control basis.

並列關鍵字

the design-build construction ； the architectural engineering ； the urban design review ； to finish by a set time ； schedule control strategy

參考文獻

13. 蔡弘祥，「建築工程設計品質評量指標之研究」，國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文， 2005年。

10. 呂欽文，「公共工程品質的十大殺手」，建築師雜誌， 2006年7月。

8. 吳綱立 ，「從西方近代都市設計思潮的發展看臺灣都市設計專業的定位」，中華民國建築學會「建築學報」，第55期，第111-146頁，2006年。

6. 黃志弘，「由成文法精神檢討”都市設計審議制度”行政行為」，中華民國建築學會「建築學報」，第25期，1998年6月。

3. 行政院公共工程委員會研究案，「統包模式之工程進度及品質管理參考手冊」，2004年。