透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.128.94.171
  • 學位論文

波士頓命名測驗在台北市國小的常模

A Normative Study of the Boston Naming Test Adapted to Elementary Schools in Taipei

指導教授 : 陳聖馨

摘要


本研究的目的是建立波士頓命名測驗在台北市國小的常模。由於波士頓命名測驗是常用的圖片命名測驗之一,目前已有發表幾種不同語言版本的常模資料,但尚無中文版的常模,故有建立常模之必要性。本研究的波士頓命名測驗中文版常模資料是蒐集就讀台北市國小一至六年級,年齡界於6至12歲,排除有接受特殊教育安置的兒童,總共蒐集516名正常發展的兒童。受過良好訓練的施測者以國語及標準化程序,針對每一名兒童進行修訂後的30題波士頓命名測驗中文版。其中215名兒童亦接受「瑞文氏圖形推理測驗」中文版及「修訂畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗」中文版。同時蒐集409名兒童最近一次的國語與數學月考成績。本研究結果發現自發性命名在不同年齡及年級上有顯著差異,但是無性別差異。此外,亦發現年齡較大的兒童較能獲得提示及選擇題的幫助。波士頓命名測驗中文版具有良好的信度與效度,它與語文智力呈現正相關,但是與非語文智力未有顯著關係。另外,學業成就並不會對波士頓命名測驗中文版的表現造成顯著的影響。總而言之,修訂後的30題波士頓命名測驗中文版是一個簡單且簡短的圖片命名能力篩檢工具。

並列摘要


The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is one of the most widely used tests for visual confrontation naming. This test has been adapted into different languages for children and normative data has been published; however, norms and adaptation of the BNT into Chinese for Taiwanese children has yet to be reported. The present study adapted the BNT into Chinese and collected normative data from elementary school children in Taipei. A modified 30-item BNT were administered to 516 normally developing children aged 6 to 12 from first to sixth grade from five elementary schools in Taipei. In order to evaluate the validity of this modified Chinese BNT, a subgroup of children were also administered the Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM) and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test- Revised (PPVT-R), and school achievements on Chinese and Math scores were as well. Spontaneous naming was significantly different between age groups or grade levels. However, no gender differences in performance were found. In addition, older children were found to benefit more from cuing and multiple-choice options. Our modified Chinese version of BNT showed excellent validity and reliability. Performance on the BNT was found to be positively correlated with verbal intelligence but not with non-verbal intelligence. In addition, performance on our modified BNT was not significantly affected by school achievement. In sum, our modified Chinese version of the 30-item BNT was found to be a simple and brief tool that could be used as a screen for deficits in confrontation naming.

參考文獻


Lin, B. G. (1996). Manual for Language Test for School Age Children. Taiwan, Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University, Special Education Center.
Ardila, A., & Rosselli, M. (1994). Development of language, memory, and visuospatial abilities in 5- to 12-year-old children using a neuropsychological battery. Development Neuropsychology, 10, 97-120.
Bello, A., Capirci, O., & Volterra, V. (2004). Lexical production in children with Williams syndrome: spontaneous use of gesture in a naming task. Neuropsychologia, 42, 201-213.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 141-154.

延伸閱讀