透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.131.168
  • 學位論文

社區參與生態旅遊之研究— 以陽明山國家公園魚路古道結合八煙社區為例

Community Participation in Ecotourism —A Case of Incorporating the Fish Road Historic Trail and Bayan Community in the Yangmingshan National Park

指導教授 : 張長義

摘要


本研究以陽明山國家公園管理處推動魚路古道結合八煙社區發展生態旅遊為例,以紮根理論為本,採文獻回顧、參與觀察、深入訪談等質性研究方法,探討國家公園內的社區參與生態旅遊之推展。本研究重要發現如下: 1.社區參與生態旅遊並未被有效推動: 八煙社區參與國家公園生態旅遊,是國家公園管理處承接由上而下推動的政策,社區參與程度低,參與的居民亦不清楚生態旅遊計畫的進行。目前的政策無法使社區參與生態旅遊在國家公園內落實,有必要修正。 2.國家公園經營管理體系未能隨計畫調整: 管理處的業務分工尚未能配合社區參與的考量,在權責不明的情況下推動生態旅遊,容易忽略社區的參與。 3.參與居民提升了對管理處和在地的認同: 從參與的居民對活動及人員的肯定,並同時強化了對自身文化價值的認同感來看,可以肯定國家公園管理處在此地確有努力的成果。 本研究建議在國家公園內推動生態旅遊政策,應給予充分時間溝通,適當培力管理處人員,讓他們具備推動生態旅遊的知識和能力,並且還可適當協助調整國家公園經營管理體系,以利進行。

並列摘要


This study discusses the process and problems of promoting community participation in ecotourism in the national park. We took the ecotourism spot, Fish Road Historic Trail and Bayan Community in the Yangmingshan National Park, for the case study. The grounded theory of qualitative research, literature review, participant-observation and in-depth interviews were used to thoroughly analyze how the community participation in ecotourism was carried out by the Yangmingshan National Park Headquarters. There are important findings in this research as below. 1.The participation has not been performed well. The community participation is one step of a top-down policy promoted by the Headquarters. However, the residents poorly participated and knew very little about the ecotourism promotion there. While the ecotourism spot was selected, the participation was done. It can be sure that the promoted policy now cannot make the community participation in ecotourism workable in the national park. 2.The management structure of national park institution has not been adjusted to the promotion. The division of the institution still could not match the community participation procedure. Under the circumstance of unobvious authority, the participation could be ignored easily. 3.The participant residents have raised their identification with the Headquarters and local culture. As a result, we can be sure that there is some achievement of the community participation the Headquarters have made. These results suggest that in order to improve the promotion, there should be enough time for mutaul communication among decision-makers, the Park Headquarters, and community, suitable training of park personnel, and appropriate ajustment for the National Park institutional structure.

參考文獻


周淑卿 (2001) 課程決定的賦權迷思-集中化與離中化的探討,教育研究集刊,47:91-106。
王麗雲、潘慧玲 (2000) 教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略,教育研究集刊,44:173-199。
黃躍雯 (2006) 雪霸國家公園雪見地區的生態旅遊發展策略,中國地理學會會刊,37:27-43。
曾偉君 (2006) 臺灣國家公園之遊憩效益及其物種多樣性之價值,戶外遊憩研究,19(2):87-102。
吳欣頤、林晏洲、黃文卿 (2005) 太魯閣國家公園原住民社區居民對發展生態旅遊知認知與需求,戶外遊憩研究,18(4):47-67。

被引用紀錄


顏郁樺(2016)。文化生態系服務與人類福祉關係的研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201610263
廖婉儒(2011)。社區本位生態旅遊之發展歷程探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.02094
彭安琪(2011)。宜蘭縣無尾港水鳥保護區社區監測的施行與研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.01971
胡綱顯(2009)。台灣生態旅遊相關學位論文之內容分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.01215
柯明宏(2008)。籌設中國家公園之權益關係人分析研究-綠島之個案〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.01527

延伸閱讀