近年來,屢次發生食品GMP商品或具有食品GMP標章之廠商產生食安問題之情況,使得食品GMP標章的適用與否受到諸多討論。我國政府於民國105年6月將食品GMP制度轉交由民間臺灣優良食品發展協會負責,更名為TQF,並於民國105年9月正式發文將食品GMP制度廢除。本研究主要根據政策變遷文獻整理影響政策變遷的因素,並將其分為外部因素與政策因素,透過深度訪談的方式,從中尋找影響我國政府將食品GMP廢除的原因及其政策變遷類型為何,同時,了解廢除過程中相關團體所採取之行動。 本研究共訪談代表不同單位的五位受訪者,透過訪談內容及次級資料的整理,首先,研究結果發現食品GMP改革的過程中,外部因素的焦點事件及技術變遷會驅動政策變遷,政策標的團體則是阻礙政策變遷,此外,政策因素中政策偏好、政策規劃與政策執行會影響食品GMP制度變遷的方向。第二,選舉與價值信念對於改革有間接的影響;由於行動強度及時間不足,因此,政策企業家並未造成影響。第三,根據政府角色與政策內容的變化,我國食品GMP制度變遷類型可分為政策終結與政策賡續,本研究將其歸類為非線性政策賡續。
In recent years, there are many food safety problems of products or food companies which have GMP logo. Because of the problems, issue of GMP is suitable or not has been discussed frequently. Government transferred GMP to Taiwan Quality Food Association and changed the name to TQF in the meantime. This essay based on past literatures about policy change to discover the factors of policy change, classified them into two categories, external factor and policy factor. Found out the reasons caused the abolishment of GMP and its policy change type, meanwhile, knowing the behavior of related group by in-depth interview. This essay interviewed five persons from different background. Through the interview and secondary data, this essay reaches three conclusions: First, focusing event and change of technique drived the policy change, meanwhile, target groups obstructed policy change. In addition, policy preference, policy planning and policy implementation affect the direction of policy change. Second, election and value of society affect policy change indirectly. Besides, policy enterprises didn’t cause affection due to their strength of action and lack of time. Third, according to the change of government’s role and policy context, the type of GMP system change can be classified into policy termination and policy succession. This essay classified it into non-linear succession.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。