透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.76.43
  • 學位論文

我國警察機關派出所所長遴選之研究: 以籃中演練為例

The Study of Selection System for Police Station Chief: An Application of In-Basket Exercises

指導教授 : 黃一峯

摘要


派出所是警察機關的縮影,所長在警察機關中有一定的重要性,因此如何遴選一個好的所長值得研究。本研究主要的目的是藉由籃中演練的概念與方法,提供一套科學、客觀的派出所所長遴選方式,以拔擢優秀人才,擔任基層主管職務。 本研究共分五個章節,首先緒論介紹研究動機與目的、範圍與限制、研究方法以及重要名詞解釋。其次進行文獻探討,提供本研究理論依據。再進行研究設計,確立研究架構。最後進行資料分析,以獲取結論並建議。 本研究結果如下: 壹、管理職能 一、派出所所長應具備的管理職能 依歸納結果區分為六大類管理職能,分別為「公平公正」、「察能授權」、「貫徹命令」、「體能技術」、「誠信廉潔」、「法令素養」。 二、人口變項與管理職能的關係 本研究人口差異變項計有「職別」、「年齡」、「年資」、「單位」等四項,而其中與管理職能有顯著相關的計有「職別」與「單位」二項。 貳、關鍵任務 一、關鍵任務的建立 關鍵任務計有十項,分別為「領導統御」、「內部管理」、「公關協調」、「犯罪偵查」、「勤務規劃」、「現場指揮」、「危機處理」、「勤務督導」、「勤前教育」、「輿論與媒體運用」。 二、人口變項與關鍵任務的關係 (一)職別方面 在十項關鍵任務中,僅有「輿論與媒體運用」得分達到顯著水準,其餘皆無顯著差異。 (二)年齡方面 有關年齡與十項關鍵任務的關聯性,計有「勤務督導」與「勤前教育」得分達到顯著水準,其餘皆無顯著差異。 (三)單位方面 單位差異對於十項關鍵任務中「公關協調」、「犯罪偵查」、「勤務規劃」、「現場指揮」、「勤務督導」、「勤前教育」等六項均達顯著性水準。 参、籃中演練題本的建立 領導統御與內部管理各佔四題,公關協調三題,犯罪偵查三題,勤務規劃三題,現場指揮三題,危機處理三題,勤務督導三題,勤前教育三題,輿論與媒體運用佔權重最少僅有二題。

並列摘要


The local police station is the epitome of police's organ, the chief of institute has certain importance in police's organ, so it is worth studying how to select a good chief of institute. The main purpose of this research is concept and method carried on the exercise in the basket, offer a set of science, objective local police station chief to select the way, in order to promote outstanding talents, it is in charge of the post to hold the basic unit. This research divides into five chapters together, the introduction introduces research motive and purpose, range and restriction, research approach and important explanation of nouns at first. Secondly carry on the literature discussion, offer the theoretical foundation of this research. And then carry on research to design, establish the structure of studying. Carry on analysis finally, in order to obtain the conclusion and combine the suggestion. This result of study is as follows: One, managerial competency First, managerial competency which the chief of local police station should possess Divide into six major kinds of managerial competnecies in accordance with the result of summing up, it is respectively for being ' fair and just ', examine can authorize, ' carry out order ', ' physical stamina technology ', ' sincerity the clean ', ' decree accomplishment '. Second, population turns into a relation with managerial competency. It has four items such as ' office ranks ', ' age ', ' age and service seniority ', ' the unit ' that this research differences of people change one, and two items of ' office ranks ' and ' the unit ' showing the relevant one with the managerial competency among them. Two, key task First, setting-up of key task The key task has ten items, in order to control respectively ', ' internal management ', ' the public relations are coordinated ', ' the crime is investigated ', ' duty plan ', ' floor manager ', ' deal with crisis ', ' supervise duty ', ' educate before being the hardworking ', ' use public opinion and media '. Second, population turns into a relation with key task (1) Office rank respect Among ten key task, have ' public opinion and media use ' a goal up to competence of showing only, the others all have no difference of showing. (2) Age respect Relevant age with ten key task getting related, have until ' educate before being hardworking ', a goal up to competence of showing, the others all have no difference of showing. (3) Unit respect The unit difference is to in ten key tasks ' the public relations are coordinated ', ' crime investigate ', it plan duty, ' floor manager ', ' supervise duty ', ' educate before being the hardworking ',etc. the six itemses reach levels dominant. … , the basket is carried on the exercise of the originally setting-up of the question The leader controls and each takes four questions with internal management, the public relations coordinate three questions, the crime investigates three questions, plan three questions in duty, three questions of floor manager, deal with three questions, supervise three questions in duty in crisis, educate three question before being hardworking, public opinion and media use weight of taking at least for 2 questions.

參考文獻


Quinn,Robert E.,Faerman,Sue R., Thompson, Michael P.& Mcgrath, Michael R.,
張裕隆,民90,管理才能測驗發展及信效度分析(1),應用心理研究第十期
吳秉恩,民72,管理才能發展方案實施與成效關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
Boyatzis, R.E,1982, The Competence Manager: A Model for Effective Performance,
Castetter,W.B. ,1996,The Human resource function in education

被引用紀錄


韓錦秋(2008)。公務人員升遷評鑑指標之研究:以外交部薦任晉升簡任人員為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2008.00712

延伸閱讀