設備隔震對文物典藏空間防震影響之評估

The Impact of Equipment Seismic Isolation on Collection Space for Museums

馬朱乾(Chu-Chien Ma)

指導教授 ： 王聰榮

國立臺北科技大學/設計學院/建築與都市設計研究所/碩士(2008年)

https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2008.00426

摘要

本研究僅針對典藏空間的防震需求與典藏空間設置設備隔震進行探討，以量化研究為主並採用問卷調查收集相關資料。首先，透過文獻分析方法初擬問卷架構之基礎資料，並透過五位專家審查修正問卷架構與內容；其次，以預試問卷統計來提高問卷之信、效度的修正，以完成正式問卷的設計；最後，在研究對象經過篩選後，選擇國內博物館共十九所計81名典藏人員作為受測對象，總計回收六十八份，有效問卷共六十六份；以統計方法分析包含描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、相依樣本t檢定、單因子變異數等分析防震需求與設置設備隔震課題，並根據研究結果提出結論與建議：（1）在防震需求，超過半數認同典藏空間採用傳統防震，建議規劃防震時以傳統防震措施為主，運用設備隔震為輔，兩者防震措施應融合於典藏空間規劃防震措施之設計，研究樣本數中顯示需加強女性典藏人員對典藏空間規劃防震措施的觀念；（2）在設置設備隔震課題，主要以安全因素為最重要考量，而空間因素佔次要，五項因素中最不認同為技術因素，設備隔震應以降低地震災害為主要功能，在空間上比傳統防震更具有彈性的規劃，在技術方面對設備隔震認知仍是缺乏，建議博物館加強典藏人員對防震措施認知的提升；（3）建議未來設置設備隔震課題，未來「經濟因素、安全因素、空間因素」層面考量顯著高於現在的時間尺度，顯示認同設備隔震的典藏人員應加強防震措施、經濟方面正確的觀念、安全上的宣導與空間規劃上的落實層面，並提高東部與離島地區博物館內部典藏人員對設備隔震的防震認知。

關鍵字

防震措施 ； 設備隔震 ； 典藏空間 ； 典藏人員

並列摘要

This study aimed to investigate the aseismatic requirement and equipment seismic isolation in collection spaces. Based on the quantitative research method, a questionnaire survey was conducted to collect research data. First of all, the basic framework of the questionnaire was established through literature review, and five experts were invited to review and modify the structure and content of the questionnaire. Later, a pre-test of the questionnaire was carried out to enhance the reliability and validity of the questionnaire and derive the formal questionnaire. Lastly, a total of 81 collection staffs from 19 domestic museums were selected as research subjects. 68 copies of the questionnaires were retrieved, and 66 were valid. The collected data were further processed with descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, dependent sample t-test, and one-way ANOVA to analyze the issues related to aseismatic requirement and equipment seismic isolation. According to the research results, conclusions and suggestions were proposed as follows: (1) In the aspect of aseismatic requirement, the majority of the subjects agreed with the adoption of traditional aseismatic measures in collection spaces, suggesting that based on traditional aseismatic measures, equipment seismic isolation should be integrated into the design of collection spaces. Besides, the female collection staffs’ concept of planning aseismatic measures should also be reinforced. (2) In the aspect of equipment seismic isolation, the safety factor was the priority focus, followed by the spatial factor. Among the five factors, the technical factor was considered least important. Equipment seismic isolation should mainly provide the function of seismic disaster reduction and feature more flexible spatial planning than traditional aseismatic measures. However, the research subjects’ knowledge about equipment seismic isolation was still insufficient and could be further enhanced. (3) It was suggested that equipment seismic isolation issues be more emphasized in the future. The economic factor, safety factor, and spatial factor were expected to be more important in the future than in the present, indicating that collection staffs agreeing with equipment seismic isolation need to enhance their concepts about aseismatic measures, economic factors, promulgation of safety, and spatial planning. Besides, museum staffs in eastern Taiwan or offshore islands also need to acquire more knowledge about equipment seismic isolation.

並列關鍵字

aseismatic measures ； equipment seismic isolation ； collection space ； collection staffs

參考文獻

[20] 李麗芳，「建構臺灣的文化資產危機管理體系」，博物館學季刊，pp.7-19，2002。

[19] 李麗芳，「臺灣博物館文物防震防災工作的省思 」，博物館學季刊，14:4 pp.89-104，2000。

[33] 葉貴玉，「從媒體事件探討臺灣博物館的蒐藏問題」，博物館學季刊，14:3 pp.35-40，2000。

[29] 陳欽育，「國內博物館蒐藏的省思」，博物館學季刊，14:3 pp.19-34，2000。

[35] 鄭惠英，「博物館蒐藏庫的規劃」，博物館學季刊，6（3）pp.99-104，1992。