透過您的圖書館登入
IP:34.201.37.128
  • 學位論文

Seednet DFC服務管制之研究-以有線廣播電視法之適用為中心

The Research on Regulation of Seednet DFC - Focusing on the Application of Cable Law

指導教授 : 江耀國
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


我國自1999年修改有線廣播電視法後,打破有電線電視與電信產業之間藩籬,允許有線電視業者與電信業者互相跨業經營。隨著法律的鬆綁各項新興替代性服務不斷產生,但對於舊有的管制架構與法律產生衝擊,中華電信MOD透過電信網路傳輸影音節目引發了MOD是屬於電信服務亦或是有線電視服務的爭議。最終,主管機關行政院新聞局認定中華電信MOD業務屬於有線電視服務,受到有線電視法相關規定管制,必須取得有線電視營運執照後方得推出服務。有別於擁有自有線路的第一類電信業者與有線電視業者,國內ISP業者Seednet(數位聯合電信)於2004年8月推出DFC(Digital Family Center;數位家庭中心)服務,提供用戶專屬設備接收多媒體服務再次引發了適用有線廣播電視法之爭議。透過電信網路傳輸卻未擁有自建網路,但提供特定設備(主機或盒子)以特定軟體程式播放用戶始得以觀賞的業者與有線電視、MOD還有網路視訊相比,其定位為何,在平等管理原則下,DFC是否也要適用有線電視相關之規範?此為本研究所要探討的主要問題。 本研究將透過個案比較分析法,從技術與服務的角度切入,分析比較中華電信MOD、Seednet DFC與網路視訊的差異,來為Seednet DFC定位,探討其是否為有線廣播電視服務。接著以管制衝擊分析(Regulatory Impact Analysis, RIA),分析Seednet DFC納入有線廣播電視規範下的管制衝擊。歸納分析結果後,並提出未來修法的建議與可行之方向。 關鍵字:Seednet DFC、中華電信MOD、網路視訊、匯流、管制衝擊分析

並列摘要


After the cable law was amended in 1999, our country broken the hedge between cable television (CATV) and telecommunications industries and permitted them to operate their business across each other. The loosening of the laws continuously results in all kinds of rising substitutive service, but this phenomenon impacts the old controlling frames and laws. MOD brought about the contention that whether MOD belongs to telecommunication service of to CATV service through the telecommunication network transmission audio & video program. Finally, the Government Information Office determined that that MOD business belongs to CATV service, it is controlled by cable law and relative stipulations, and it cannot offer any service until obtains the CATV operating license. Different from the type I telecommunications enterprise who has own lines and the CATV business, the internal ISP business, Seednet, pushed forward the DFC (Digital Family Center) service in August, 2004. When providing customers the service of receiving multimedia by exclusive equipment, again it caused the impact of suitability of cable law. What’s the orientation comparing the business, who transmits through telecommunication network and offers service viewed only by specific equipment and software program yet doesn’t have own network, the CATV, MOD and the streaming web video? Does the DFC also need to apply to the relative stipulations under the principle of equality management? This is the main issue needed to be conferred in this research. This research analyzes and compares the diversity of MOD, Seednet DFC and streaming web video in the technique and service point of view through case study. It orientates the Seednet DFC and confers whether the Seednet DFC belongs to cable service. Afterward, it analyzes the controlling impact of subsuming Seednet DFC into the standard of cable broadcasting and television by Regulatory Impact Analysis. After generalizing and analyzing the outcome, it will address the suggestion of future law amendment and practicable aspect. Key words: Seednet DFC, MOD, streaming web video, convergence, Regulatory Impact Analysis

延伸閱讀