海岸巡防機關以利害關係人分析強化護漁工作之研究－以臺日重疊專屬經濟海域暫定執法線護漁行動為例

A study on how the coast guard organization reinforces the fishing protection job through stakeholders analysis－take the fishing protection action of temporary enforcement line of the Taiwan- Japan overlapping exclusive economic zone as an example

黃君立(Jyun-Li Huang)

指導教授 ： 蘇俊憲

長榮大學/管理學院/高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)/碩士(2008年)

https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2008.00107

摘要

臺灣四面環海，與鄰近各國海域相接，專屬經濟海域多有重疊，惟未協商劃界，海上紛爭不斷。我國漁船前往日本主張之專屬經濟海域而常遭受監視、驅趕或扣押，漁民長期不滿之情緒，向政府陳情抗議要求護漁，保障漁民在臺日重疊海域的捕魚權。本研究試圖以專案管理之利害關係人（Stakeholders）觀點，擷取各利害關係人意見形成護漁政策，以提升護漁成效。對於有關政治、主權、地理、經濟、漁業資源因素等問題，則不在本研究範圍。因此，本研究之目的為：
（一）以專案管理之利害關係人觀點為分析基礎，擬定護漁行動對策以提升護漁成效。
（二）建構護漁對策形成之模式，護漁對策制定單位可依循此一模式， 制定屬於各個不同經濟海域之護漁因應對策，確實達到護漁效果。
研究中建構的「護漁行動對策形成模式（圖3-1與表3-1）」，成功的彙整成「重要護漁行動對策結論（如表5-1）」，因此驗證了此模式之可用性。透過此一護漁行動對策形成模式運作下（圖3-1與表3-1），未來護漁單位於任何其他海域之護漁行動對策制定與規劃過程，也有一個具有參價值的「護漁行動對策形成模式」。最後，研究中所建構的「護漁行動對策形成模式（圖3-1與表3-1）」，僅為本研究初步成果；就整個護漁行動對策與規劃模式之完整性，本研究建議如圖5-1所示之持續改善循環模式，以作為下一個階段之護漁行動對策形成模式改善方向。

關鍵字

專案利害關係人 ； 深度訪談 ； 經濟海域 ； 暫定執法線

並列摘要

Taiwan, surrounded by sea, adjoins the waters of neighboring countries with
great overlaps in Exclusive Economic Zone. Since it’s failed to negotiate
with other countries to define the line, disputes on sea then occurred
unceasingly. Taiwan’s fishing vessels operate in the Exclusive Economic
Zone claimed by Japan frequently suffer monitoring, expelling, or detaining.
With discontentedness accumulated for a long time, fishermen petition
the government for fishing protection to guarantee their fishing rights in
Taiwan-Japan overlapping waters. This study attempts to collect
project-stakeholders’ opinions from their viewpoints to formulate fishing
protection policy and therefore promote fishing protection efficiency. As for
problems concerning politics, sovereignty, geography, economy, and fishery
resource are not within the research scope herein. Therefore, this study
intends to:

(1) promote fishing protection efficiency through drafting fishing protection action countermeasures based on the analysis of project-stakeholders’ viewpoints, and
(2) establish the model of fishing protection countermeasures formulation for associated units to follow and institute fishing protection countermeasures applied in different economic waters to indeed achieve the efficiency of fishing protection.

“Fishing Protection Action Countermeasures Formulation Model (Exhibit 3-1 & Schedule 3-1)” established herein has been successfully organized and arranged to “Conclusions of Important Fishing Protection Action Countermeasures (as Schedule 5-1),” and therefore the usability of this model is verified. With the operation of Fishing Protection Action Countermeasures Formulation Model (Exhibit 3-1 & Schedule 3-1), fishing protection units can afterwards refer to the “Fishing Protection Action Countermeasures Formulation Model” of significant value while formulating and planning fishing protection action countermeasures implemented in any other waters. In conclusion, “Fishing Protection Action Countermeasures Formulation Model (Exhibit 3-1 & Schedule 3-1)” established herein is only the initial outcome. In the light of the complete of entire fishing protection action countermeasures and planning model, circulation model of continuous improvement as shown in Exhibit 5-1 is hereby suggested as the direction to improve fishing protection action countermeasures formulation model in the next phase.

並列關鍵字

Project-Stakeholders ； In-Depth Interviewing ； Exclusive Economic Zone ； Temporary Enforcement Line

參考文獻

李明峻（2005）。東海漁業糾紛與解決之道。戰略安全研析第三期，頁

王冠雄（2005）。主權之爭？抑或漁權之爭？－論東海漁業爭端之本質，

丘昌泰（2000）。公共政策。臺北市：巨流。

台灣專案管理學會 編輯委員會 (2007)，國際專案管理知識體系初版三

Brinkerhoff, D.W. and B. L. Crosby.,（2002）, Managing Policy Reform: Concepts and Tools for Decision-makers in Developing and Transitioning Countries.,Kumarian Press, Inc.