透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.235.249.219
  • 學位論文

國家競爭力對貿易自由度與貿易難易度影響之研究-以東協十國中等收入陷阱階段比較分析

Study on Relationship among Country Competitiveness, Trade Freedom and Trade Difficulty-Comparison Analysis of ASEAN Countries in the Middle Income Trap Stage

指導教授 : 呂鴻德
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


時代的變局不斷推演,推動全球經濟成長的引擎亦不斷改變,曾經是眾人矚目,認為可以快速攀上高峰的經濟體,亦有可能隨時跌落。過去受益於全球化生產,帶動外資進入快速成長的新興國家,如今開始出現成長難題。過快的發展導致社會、政治以及經濟體系的失衡隱憂。終於在2013年,出現新興國家集體成長失速的現象,使得已開發國家必須承擔拉動全球經濟成長的責任。而位於東南亞的東協十國組織,透過多年來不斷擴張區域經濟合作版圖,成為備受看好的世界經濟新星,然而高速成長下仍為這些國家帶來成長的隱憂,甚至陷入「中等收入陷阱」,難以真正的成為富裕國家。 本研究根據各研究機構報告與相關文獻探討的參考,在研究架構上以國家競爭力作為研究變數;貿易自由度與貿易難易度為依變數;並以國家就業條件做為干擾變數;以東協國家陷入收入陷阱之情形為例。透過問卷調查之量化統計分析方式,調查於東協國家經商人士對當地貿易自由度及貿易難易度之滿意度,共計回收275份有效問卷,並進行相關之統計分析,進而得到以下之研究結論,分別為: 1. 國家競爭力對貿易自由度以及貿易難易度有緊密關係,無論是國家基礎條件、國家財政條件、國家投資條件或是國家經濟條件,對會影響貿易自由度以及貿易難易度,其中更以國家基礎條件影響最大。 2. 貿易自由度及貿易難易度會因為國家處於收入陷阱情形不同而有所差異,在本研究中,將國家所處之收入陷阱情況分為「未進入中等收入」、「正處於中等收入陷阱」以及「已脫離中等收入陷阱」,陷入中等收入陷阱之經濟體會出現諸如貧富差距、人力資本不濟、金融體系脆弱、產業發展不均以及政治問題等現象,而這些現象皆可能會阻礙一個國家推行貿易環境完善的進程。 3. 貿易自由度以及貿易難易度對國家競爭力會因為國家處於收入陷阱情形不同而有所變化。在本研究中發現國家處於收入陷阱情形,無論是未進入中等收入、處於中等收入陷阱或是已脫離中等升入陷阱,都會對貿易自由度與貿易難易度對國家競爭力的影響過程中造成干擾。

並列摘要


As time changes, the engine of world economic growth has also changed. A country was on the spotlight of growing, may fall into problems any moment. Although was benefiting from globalization, attracting foreign capitals investment, emerging markets now, are facing a bottleneck. They grow so fast that couldn’t solve the socially, politically and economical unbalances. At year of 2013, most of emerging markets fall into hard growth. It makes those developed countries to lead the global economic growth. At the side south east Asia, ASEAN 10 have grown because of their trade agreement expansion, became new future growing prospects. However, ASEANs still have growing problems. Some are even caught in the middle income trap. Following by the situation, the study collects international institutions and literature review to adopt the Country Competitiveness to be independent variable, Trade Freedom and Trade Difficulty to be dependent variable, employment rate to be mediators; and take the Situation ASEAN Countries Caught in the Middle Income Trap as example. The paper is quantitative research, there were 275 effective questionnaires. After generalizing the results, it can find: 1. Country Competitiveness between the Trade Freedom and Trade Difficulty is significant. Beside, the basic elements of country is best influences the Freeness of Trade and Trade Difficulty. 2. the Situation ASEAN Countries Caught in the Middle Income Trap to differ Trade Freedom and Trade Difficulty is significant. The problem caused by Middle Income Trap may influence a coutry’s trade environment. 3. the Situation ASEAN Countries Caught in the Middle Income Trap on Trade Freedom and Trade Difficulty to Country Competitiveness is significant.

參考文獻


2. 經濟部國際貿易局http://www.trade.gov.tw/
6. 台灣經濟研究院http://www.tier.org.tw/observe/forecast.asp
3. Ferdows, K.(1997), Making the Most of Foreign Factory. Harvard Business Review, Vol.75, pp.73-88.
5. Gilpin, R.(1994), The Political Economy of International Relations, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 330.
10. Poter, M.E.(1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, N.Y.: The Fee Pess.

延伸閱讀