中文摘要 本研究延續前期研究倪晶瑋、朱綺婕、曹拯元(2011);朱綺婕(2012)在教育部友善校園與推動中原大學性別平等的目標下,繼續探討男女使用者對所熟悉生活學習樓館室內動線空間之危險感受。研究進行過程中,發現工學院樓館(土木館)之調查數據,與前期設計學院者有差異,因設計學院學生女多男少,而工學院中,則是男多女少。為進一步了解並解釋此差異現象,因此,改變研究方法,以個案研究方式,並加入實地調查、深入訪談及上課空間使用率調查等,完成對土木館男女安全感認知之研究。結論有以下7點: 1.土木館的女受測者感知特殊性。 2.女受測者在0~20m、0~60m路徑中具有日夜高差異度的危險感受。 3.男受測者在中長距離時,對動線空間的危險感受,白天具有高度之線性規律性。 4.土木館在0~30m與0~40m路徑具有夜間照明使用行為問題。 5.對男女受測者而言,物理性之最遠距離與心理認知之最遠距離不相符合。 6.在夜晚多數人感受最危險之動線為0~100m,其影響原因佔多數者為「四下無人或人煙稀少」與「不夠明亮」。 7.「樓層太高」之原因無法斷定為高樓層產生危險的主要原因。
Abstract This research is a continuation of the previous research of Nie, Zhu, Tsaur (2011) as well as Nie & Chen(2012). With the goals to promote the friendly campus launched by the Ministry of Education and the gender equality in Chung Yuan Christian University, the security perception of male and female users regarding a familiar indoor circulation space was further researched in 2012 and 2013. Nie & Chen(2012)found out that the data obtained from the building of Civil Engineering was different from the data previously obtained from College of Design, because there were more females in College of Design and fewer females in College of Engineering. In order to further understand and explain this phenomenon, this research changed the method into case study of sole building complex. Field survey, questionary, and intensive interview were added to the research, and the spatial usage rate in individual spaces were also investigated. The conclusions of this research are as follows: 1.the special characteristics of the perception of female users regarding the Civil Engineering building; 2.the significant difference in female security perception between day and night in the distances of 0 to 20m and 0 to 60m; 3.high linear regularity in male perception of security regarding circulation spaces in middle and long distances in daytime; 4.the behavior issues of the night illumination utilization in distance 0 to 30m and 0 to 40m; 5.the difference between the physically and psychologically longest distance. 6.The most dangerous distance, in this case, was 0 to 100m during night time. The two most influential reasons are “ nobody or very few people around ” and “ not bright enough ”. 7.The factor “ too high ” cannot be determined as the main reason of danger in this building complex.