國內較少對建築物漸進式倒塌分析方法加以探討,本文採用了兩棟國內的實體鋼筋混凝土建築物為案例,分別為低樓層建築物(消防隊用途)及高樓層建築物(工業廠房),依循著GSA及UFC規範所建議之分析流程,比較兩規範之差異性。 此分析採用了四種分析方法,分別為(1)線性靜力分析、(2)線性動力分析、(3)非線性靜力分析及(4)非線性動力分析等方法,考量非線性行為所造成的影響及比較在線性分析上所考量的動態放大因子2.0與動力分析下的結果。 在一般分析上,靜力分析較非線性動力分析易為工程師所接受,因此本研究探討以線性靜力分析使用動態放大因子與動態分析結果對照,確認此作法的可行性。
The procedures of progressive collapse analysis of buildings is scarce discussed in Taiwan. Two reinforced concrete buildings were used in this study. One is a low-rise building and another is high-rise building. The results were compared between two suggested analysis procedure form GSA and UFC standard. This analysis use four kinds of method: (1)linear static analysis, (2)linear dynamic analysis, (3)nonlinear static analysis, and (4)nonlinear dynamic analysis, considering the affection of nonlinear behavior and comparing the results between dynamic amplification factor 2.0 for linear analysis and dynamic analysis. In general analysis, static analysis was easily accepted for engineers than nonlinear dynamic analysis. Hence, this study considers linear static analysis with dynamic amplification factor and compare the result of dynamic analysis, and confirm the feasibility of this method.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。