國民小學創新指標建構之研究

摘要本研究旨在建構國民小學創新指標。經由文獻探討，整理出學校創新指標的理論基礎與相關概念，進而設計出「國民小學創新指標調查問卷」，依台灣地區縣市學校數比例，抽取264所公私立國民小學教育人員，共1,056人進行問卷調查，有效樣本692份，回收率為65.53%。運用描述統計、信度、效度分析、單因變異數分析、連續成對比較法（CPC）等統計方法進行分析，獲得結論如下： 1.本研究提出的創新指標體系可應用於評估學校創新程度。 2.國小教育人員較重視有關人員選培、人員關係、課程教學、學生展能等向度創新。 3.提出創新指標的相對權重體系可供使用。 4.不同背景的教育人員對學校創新指標重要性看法不同。依據上述結論，本研究提出以下建議： 1.對國民小學主管之建議 (1) 可應用國民小學學校創新指標，評估學校創新程度。 (2) 讓更多異質人員參與評定學校創新指標。 (3) 視需要發展適用學校的創新指標權重體系。 (4) 將學校創新指標納入人員考核制度，制訂創新獎勵方案。 2.對國民小學教育人員之建議 (1) 成立教師成長團體，透過知識分享機制，提升創新成效。 (2) 建立教師溝通平台，促進教師跨世代創意交流。 3.對後續研究者之建議 (1) 驗證國小創新指標權重體系的重測信度和跨樣本效度。 (2) 運用所提創新指標於其他層級學校，以驗證或建立新的指標權重體系。

關鍵字

創新；指標；小學；創新指標

並列摘要

Abstract The purpose of this study is to assessing Elementary School innovation indicators. According to literature review, theoretical bases and related concepts of innovation indicators in school and a questionnaire of the Indicators for Elementary School Innovation were designed. According to proportion of elementary school number of Taiwan, 1,056 school educators were randomly sampled from 264 public and private elementary schools, 692 samples were corrected and the rate of retrieve was 65.53％. The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, reliability and validity analysis, one-way ANOVA, and chainwise paired comparisons (CPC). Conclusions are as follows: 1. The school innovation indicator system may useful to assess the degree of school innovation. 2. The personnel took care on the innovation of personnel preparation, personnel relationship, curriculum and teaching, and student capacities development. 3. The relative weight indicators system of school innovation was useful to use. 4. The education personnel with different background are different to the school innovation indicators important view. According to conclusions, some suggestions are as follows: 1. Suggestions to educational authorities in elementary school: (1) To use the innovation indicators for elementary school to assess the degree of school innovation. (2) To invite various personnel to participate the assessment of school innovation indicators. (3) To develop one weight indicator system for school innovation based upon the real needs of school practice. (4) To integrate the school innovation indicators into the evaluation system of personnel performance, and conduct one reward project for innovation performance. 2. Suggestions to educators in elementary school: (1) To set up teacher growing communities, and promote the effects of innovation by knowledge share mechanism. (2) To establish a platform for teachers communication to promote creativity exchange among the different generation teachers. 3. Suggestions to future researchers: (1) To confirm the re-test reliability and cross-validity of innovation weight indicator system for elementary school. (2) To apply the innovation indicators in other level schools to verify or propose a new weight indicator system.