透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.169.85
  • 學位論文

公立國民小學校長在國際安全學校認知、關注階段與推行意圖之研究-以臺北市為例

Research on Cognition, Stages of Concern and Implementation Intention in International Safe School among Public Elementary School Principals in Taipei City

指導教授 : 胡益進
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在瞭解臺北市公立國民小學校長在國際安全學校的認知、關注階段與推行意圖之情形及其相關因素。研究採量化方式進行,以臺北市99學年度141位公立國民小學校長為研究對象,採全面普測方式進行,計有效樣本138人。 研究工具使用結構式問卷進行資料蒐集,問卷內容包括:(一) 國際安全學校認知、(二) 國際安全學校關注階段、(三)推行國際安全學校的行為意圖、(四)基本資料。問卷調查所得資料以SPSS 12.0 for Windows套裝軟體進行統計分析,採用次數分配、百分率、平均數、t-test、單因子變異數分析及皮爾森積差相關進行統計分析。 研究主要發現: 一、臺北市公立國民小學尚有近六成的校長未曾參加過國際安全學校相關研習。 二、有九成以上的臺北市公立國民小學校長表示對「國際安全學校計畫」是非常支持或支持。 三、臺北市目前有近一成的學校已開始推行「國際安全學校計畫」,還有九成尚未推行。在全體校長中,只有二成二的校長自覺在「國際安全學校計畫」的推行上,是沒有困難的。 四、臺北市公立國民小學校長在國際安全學校的認知,以危機因應向度最高,答對率為九成七;在國際安全學校概念的認知最低,答對率只有四成。 五、臺北市公立國民小學校長在國際安全學校的關注階段,最高為成效關注,其次為資訊關注。 六、臺北市公立國民小學校長在國際安全學校的推行意圖上,未來三年內推行的可能性高於在下一個新學年度推行的可能性。 七、影響臺北市公立國民小學校長在國際安全學校認知的因素,包括:年齡、最高學歷、曾擔任主任年資、安全相關課程研習時數、是否參加過國際安全學校研習、自覺對國際安全學校的支持度和執行能力、是否已開始推行和是否已通過認證等9項。 八、影響臺北市公立國民小學校長在國際安全學校關注階段的因素,包括:擔任該校校長年資、曾擔任主任年資、安全相關課程研習時數、是否參加過國際安全學校研習、自覺對國際安全學校的支持度、執行能力、推行困難度、學校行政區、是否已開始推行、是否已通過認證等10項。 九、影響臺北市公立國民小學校長在國際安全學校推行意圖的因素,包括:性別、自覺對國際安全學校的支持度、執行能力、推行困難度、學校行政區、是否已開始推行、是否已通過認證等7項。 十、整體認知與合作關注、成效關注、資訊關注、再關注、個人關注呈現正相關,與低度關注呈現負相關。 十一、整體認知與整體推行意圖無顯著相關,但與未來三年內推行的可能性有正相關;而體育活動和危機因應向度的認知,則與整體推行意圖有正相關。 十二、整體推行意圖與合作關注、成效關注、資訊關注、個人關注、再關注呈現正相關,與低度關注呈現負相關。

並列摘要


The purpose of the research was to realize the situation and its related factors in connection with Cognition, Stages of Concern and Implementation Intention in International Safe Schools among Public Elementary School Principals in Taipei City. The research applied quantitative method in proceeding; research object was the Principals of Public Elementary School in Taipei City in 2010 by total 141 took in participate; through the comprehensive general survey, there were 138 effective samples among the participants. Tool used in the research applies structured questionnaires to collect information. The questionnaires consisted of : (1)International Safe School Cognition(2)International Safe School Concern(3)International Safe School Implementation Intention(4)Basic Data. All of the information that obtained from the questionnaires were analyzed in SPSS 12.0 for Windows through statistical software, such as frequency distribution, percentage, average, t-test, one-way ANOVA and Pearson. Major findings in the research : 1.There were approximately sixty percent of Public Elementary School Principals in Taipei City had not participated any International Safe School workshop yet. 2.There were more than ninety percent of Public Elementary School Principals in Taipei City expressed that they were Strongly Support or Support “International Safe School Plan”. 3.Currently, there were approximately ten percent of schools had launched the implementation of “International Safe School Plan” in Taipei City; whereas there were ninety percent of schools had not launched yet. Among all of the principals, there were only twenty-two percent thought that the implementation of “International Safe School Plan” was not difficult. 4.In regard to Cognition in International Safe School, Crisis Action was the most concerned by Public Elementary School Principals in Taipei City for its correct answer attains ninety-seven percent; however, Concept was the least one for its correct answer just only attained forty percent. 5.In regard to Stages of Concern in International Safe School, Consequence was the first concerned by Public Elementary School Principals in Taipei City; whereas Informational was the second one. 6.In regard to Implementation Intention in International Safe School, the possibility to implement within the next three years was higher than the next session for Public Elementary School Principals in Taipei City. 7.There were 9 factors influencing Public Elementary School Principals in Taipei City on the Cognition in International Safe School, that was : age; highest level of education; total of years ever being a supervisor; total of hours participated in the related safety workshop; whether ever participated International Safe School workshop or not; support level in International Safe School; execution; whether had launched the implementation or not; whether had been certified or not. 8.There wee 10 factors influencing Public Elementary School Principals in Taipei City on the Stages of Concern in International Safe School, that was : total of years being a principal in the school; total of years ever being a supervisor; total of hours participated in the related safety workshop; whether ever participated International Safe School workshop or not; support level in International Safe School; execution; difficult level in implementation; administrative region of school; whether had launched the implementation or not; whether had been certified or not. 9.There were 7 factors influencing Public Elementary School Principals in Taipei City on the Implementation Intention in International Safe School, that was : gender; support level in International Safe School; execution; difficult level in implementation; administrative region of school; whether had launched the implementation or not; whether had been certified or not. 10.Cognition appeared positive correlation to Collaboration, Consequence, Informational, Refocusing and Personal in general; but it appeared negative correlation to Awareness. 11.Generally, Cognition and Implementation Intention had no significant correlation with each other, but had positive correlation to the possibility of implementation within the next three years; whereas Cognition of Physical Training and Crisis Action had positive correlation to Implementation Intention in general. 12.Implementation Intention appeared positive correlation to Collaboration, Consequence, Informational, Personal and Refocusing in general; but it appeared negative correlation to Awareness.

參考文獻


謝文豪(2004)。國民小學校長之變革關注與變革領導策略之探討。花蓮師院學報,18,1—30。
李明憲(2007)。安全學校推動前驅計畫輔導手冊。行政院衛生署委託計畫。
孫志麟、陳建銘(2007)。學校組織變革中的教師關注:發展階段與類型分析。師大學報,52(1),159-180。
子龍(2003)。專訪台南縣佳里鎮子龍國小黃南慶校長。學校行政雙月刊,27,110-116。
張茂源(2002)。危機管理與學校行政領導。學校行政雙月刊,18,29-37。

延伸閱讀