透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.140.242.165
  • 學位論文

報讀與口述回答之評量調整措施對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解表現之比較研究

The Comparative Study on Assessment Accommodations of Reading Aloud and Response on the Performance of Reading Comprehension Test for Junior High School Students with Learning Disabilities

指導教授 : 杜正治
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在探討報讀與口述回答之評量調整措施對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解表現之比較研究。研究對象為就讀於新北市立某國中身心障礙資源班之三名學習障礙學生,以單一受試法交替處理設計進行閱讀理解測驗。 本研究的自變項為報讀與口述回答兩種評量調整措施;主要依變項則為閱讀理解表現。研究者以閱讀理解測驗結果,分析實驗介入後受試者閱讀理解能力的表現。本研究結果如下: 一、 在閱讀理解測驗「理解能力」上,受試甲、受試乙、受試丙接受報讀後的表現明顯優於口述回答,。 二、 在閱讀理解測驗「分析能力」上,受試甲和受試丙接受報讀後的表現明顯優於口述回答,受試乙的表現則無法看出兩者差異。 三、 在閱讀理解測驗「整體表現」上,受試甲和受試丙接受報讀後的表現明顯優於口述回答,受試乙的表現則無法看出兩者差異。 四、 最後再根據上述研究結果做進一步討論並提出相關建議,以供未來 教學及研究之參考。

並列摘要


The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of assessment accommodations on the performance of reading comprehension test for junior high school students with learning disabilities. The participants of the research are three students with learning disabilities placed in the resource class of a junior high school in New Taipei City for those with mental retardation who accepted reading aloud and dictated response as assessment accomdations. The alternating treatments design of the single subject experimental design was employed in this study. The independent variables were two assessment accommodations: reading aloud and dictated response, whereas the dependent variable was the performance of reading comprehension. Based on the results of the reading comprehension test, the reseracher analyze the performance of reading comprehension after the experimental intervention. The results of the reseach were demonstrated as follows: 1. In terms of the “comprehensive ability” on the reading comprehension test, the performance of all the three participants accepting reading aloud service is obviously superior to the performance after their acceptance of dictated response. 2. In terms of the “analyzing ability” on the reading comprehension test, the performance of participants A and C who accetped reading aloud service is conspicuously better than their performance assisted by dictated response, whereas there is no difference in participant B’s performance. 3. In terms of the “overall performance” on the reading comprehension test, participants A and C did evidently better with the assistance of reading aloud than dictated response; however, there is no difference in participant B’s performance. 4. At last, relevant suggestions and further discussions based on the above research results were proposed for the future teaching and study.

參考文獻


2006 報告)第二版。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所閱讀與學習研
劉瓊文(2001)。多元化閱讀理解評量對國小五年級學童閱讀發展之相關
胡永崇(2005a)。評量調整在學習障礙學生之運用。載於王瓊珠、洪儷
王心怡(2006)。故事結構教學對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解教學成效之
邱小芳、詹士宜(2009)。詞彙導向之繪本教學對國小學習障礙學生閱讀

被引用紀錄


簡群恩(2014)。外加口述影像之評量調整措施對重度視障生在數學科圖題理解之成效〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0006-2708201409555500

延伸閱讀